Reassessing global trade and welfare impacts of EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism in developing countries: a structural quantitative model

The European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has been agreed on since 2023, while the discussions, especially in developing members that have higher carbon intensity, are still underway. Here, we used a structural quantitative trade model to analyze how the EU CBAM affects the shifts of global trade and welfare along a progression of sector coverage, carbon price and free allowances, through uncovering the interactions with the cost, total quantity and the share of interregional trade. Global trade-related data that cover bilateral trade from the BACI database, tariffs from the WITS database and EU Commission, and World Input-Output Table from Asian Development Bank are collected and aggregated into 54 regions and 35 industries. The CBAM interactions showed a significant impact on the export of BRICS in terms of their steel, fertilizer and cement products and of China’s aluminum product, and of developed countries of Japan and South Korea; this is, it deteriorates trade terms of developing countries. Top five countries with higher carbon tariffs are India (820 million US$), Russia (796 million US$), China (337 million US$), Turkey (163 million US$) and the United States (125 million US$) under 85$/tCO 2 eq carbon tax scenario, and the tariffs would be three-folds under the 250$/tCO 2 eq scenario. Welfare loss is relatively limited among countries in the BAU scenario, while become significant when the EU enlarges its sectoral coverage and carbon price of the CBAM. The re-assessment with published data and the agreement may help developing countries to suggest action priorities and achieve low carbon development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08941-y
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassessing global trade and welfare impacts of EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism in developing countries: a structural quantitative model

Xianmei Liu, Xiaolong Lu, Hao Li, Zhaohua Wang et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Reassessing global trade and welfare impacts of EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism in developing countries: a structural quantitative model

Xianmei Liu, Xiaolong Lu, Hao Li, Zhaohua Wang, Song Wang, Yuelan Cheng
article en

Abstract

The European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has been agreed on since 2023, while the discussions, especially in developing members that have higher carbon intensity, are still underway. Here, we used a structural quantitative trade model to analyze how the EU CBAM affects the shifts of global trade and welfare along a progression of sector coverage, carbon price and free allowances, through uncovering the interactions with the cost, total quantity and the share of interregional trade. Global trade-related data that cover bilateral trade from the BACI database, tariffs from the WITS database and EU Commission, and World Input-Output Table from Asian Development Bank are collected and aggregated into 54 regions and 35 industries. The CBAM interactions showed a significant impact on the export of BRICS in terms of their steel, fertilizer and cement products and of China’s aluminum product, and of developed countries of Japan and South Korea; this is, it deteriorates trade terms of developing countries. Top five countries with higher carbon tariffs are India (820 million US$), Russia (796 million US$), China (337 million US$), Turkey (163 million US$) and the United States (125 million US$) under 85$/tCO 2 eq carbon tax scenario, and the tariffs would be three-folds under the 250$/tCO 2 eq scenario. Welfare loss is relatively limited among countries in the BAU scenario, while become significant when the EU enlarges its sectoral coverage and carbon price of the CBAM. The re-assessment with published data and the agreement may help developing countries to suggest action priorities and achieve low carbon development.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Hebei University of Economics and Business (CN), Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN), Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, Hebei University
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.