Analysis of sustainable facility management performance in university campuses based on user satisfaction indicators: the case of Ankara University Besevler Campus

Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of social governance and sustainability practices, in conjunction with technical maintenance services, on users’ perceptions of indoor comfort within university campuses. By addressing the underexplored relationship between social sustainability and user experience, the research seeks to provide evidence-based insights for sustainable campus facility management. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 221 academic and administrative staff members at Ankara University’s Besevler Campus. Data were collected using a 24-item, five-point Likert-scale questionnaire. The study used Anderson and Gerbing’s (1988) two-step structural modelling approach. In the first stage, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to validate the measurement model; in the second stage, hierarchical regression analysis was used to test the structural relationships among variables. Findings The results revealed a three-factor structure for campus facility management evaluations: indoor comfort (F1, a = 0.87), social governance and sustainability (F2, a = 0.80) and technical maintenance services (F3, a = 0.71). The social governance factor (β = 0.334, p < 0.001) exerted a stronger influence on comfort perception than the technical maintenance factor (ß = 0.275, p < 0.001), explaining 25.9% of the total variance (R² = 0.259). Moreover, social governance practices provided a statistically significant incremental contribution of 10.6% beyond technical maintenance (ΔR² = 0.106, p < 0.001). Critical deficiencies were identified in parking (M = 2.01), recycling (M = 2.40) and bicycle infrastructure (M = 2.60). Originality/value This study empirically demonstrates that sustainable campuses cannot be achieved solely through technical efficiency but require socially inclusive governance mechanisms, user participation and environmental awareness initiatives. By quantifying the contribution of social governance practices to perceived comfort, the research expands the traditional, technically oriented facility management perspective towards a more holistic social sustainability framework and proposes 15 evidence-based strategic, tactical and operational recommendations for campus facility managers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Facilities Management
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-11-2025-0191
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of sustainable facility management performance in university campuses based on user satisfaction indicators: the case of Ankara University Besevler Campus

Sinan Güneş, Esra Keskin, Dilara Avci
Journal of Facilities Management
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Analysis of sustainable facility management performance in university campuses based on user satisfaction indicators: the case of Ankara University Besevler Campus

Sinan Güneş, Esra Keskin, Dilara Avci
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of social governance and sustainability practices, in conjunction with technical maintenance services, on users’ perceptions of indoor comfort within university campuses. By addressing the underexplored relationship between social sustainability and user experience, the research seeks to provide evidence-based insights for sustainable campus facility management. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 221 academic and administrative staff members at Ankara University’s Besevler Campus. Data were collected using a 24-item, five-point Likert-scale questionnaire. The study used Anderson and Gerbing’s (1988) two-step structural modelling approach. In the first stage, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to validate the measurement model; in the second stage, hierarchical regression analysis was used to test the structural relationships among variables. Findings The results revealed a three-factor structure for campus facility management evaluations: indoor comfort (F1, a = 0.87), social governance and sustainability (F2, a = 0.80) and technical maintenance services (F3, a = 0.71). The social governance factor (β = 0.334, p < 0.001) exerted a stronger influence on comfort perception than the technical maintenance factor (ß = 0.275, p < 0.001), explaining 25.9% of the total variance (R² = 0.259). Moreover, social governance practices provided a statistically significant incremental contribution of 10.6% beyond technical maintenance (ΔR² = 0.106, p < 0.001). Critical deficiencies were identified in parking (M = 2.01), recycling (M = 2.40) and bicycle infrastructure (M = 2.60). Originality/value This study empirically demonstrates that sustainable campuses cannot be achieved solely through technical efficiency but require socially inclusive governance mechanisms, user participation and environmental awareness initiatives. By quantifying the contribution of social governance practices to perceived comfort, the research expands the traditional, technically oriented facility management perspective towards a more holistic social sustainability framework and proposes 15 evidence-based strategic, tactical and operational recommendations for campus facility managers.

Journal of Facilities Management
Çankaya University (TR), Ankara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.