Online promotional practices and apparent violations from licensed cannabis retail stores in Canada

BACKGROUND: Canada legalized non-medical cannabis in 2018, with marketing and promotion regulated under the Cannabis Act. However, little is known about the promotional practices of licensed cannabis retailers. This study analyzed the online content of Canadian cannabis retailer websites and assessed apparent violations of federal marketing regulations. METHODS: A cross-sectional content analysis of cannabis retailer websites across all 13 Canadian provinces and territories. Of the 3599 operational licensed cannabis-retail retailers (3368 private and 231 government operated) in Canada in April 2025, we included each of the government-operated cannabis retailer websites (n = 8) and a random sub-sample of private retailer websites (n = 145). Retailer website content was extracted using a standardized codebook comprising 13 promotion-related categories derived from the Cannabis Act to identify apparent violations. RESULTS: One or more apparent marketing violations were identified on 97% of cannabis retailer websites. Apparent violations were somewhat less common among government-operated retailers (75%) than private retailers (97%). Age verification was absent on 8.5% of websites, all of which were privately operated. Inducement-related content was most common apparent violation (86%), followed by endorsements or testimonials (46%), lifestyle promotion (23%), youth-appealing content (23%), and health or cosmetic benefit claims (22%). INTERPRETATION: Promotional content that may contravene the Cannabis Act was commonly observed on Canadian cannabis retailer websites. These findings suggest that gaps exist between regulatory standards and online retail practices within Canada's legal cannabis market. As more jurisdictions consider cannabis legalization, this evidence can help inform the development and enforcement of cannabis promotion-related regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Drug Policy
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2026.105350
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online promotional practices and apparent violations from licensed cannabis retail stores in Canada

Jean‐François Crépault, Anosha Waqar, KARA THOMPSON, Rachael MacDonald-Spracklin et al.
International Journal of Drug Policy
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Online promotional practices and apparent violations from licensed cannabis retail stores in Canada

Jean‐François Crépault, Anosha Waqar, KARA THOMPSON, Rachael MacDonald-Spracklin, Benedikt Fischer, Ayaan Islam, Daniel T Myran
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Canada legalized non-medical cannabis in 2018, with marketing and promotion regulated under the Cannabis Act. However, little is known about the promotional practices of licensed cannabis retailers. This study analyzed the online content of Canadian cannabis retailer websites and assessed apparent violations of federal marketing regulations. METHODS: A cross-sectional content analysis of cannabis retailer websites across all 13 Canadian provinces and territories. Of the 3599 operational licensed cannabis-retail retailers (3368 private and 231 government operated) in Canada in April 2025, we included each of the government-operated cannabis retailer websites (n = 8) and a random sub-sample of private retailer websites (n = 145). Retailer website content was extracted using a standardized codebook comprising 13 promotion-related categories derived from the Cannabis Act to identify apparent violations. RESULTS: One or more apparent marketing violations were identified on 97% of cannabis retailer websites. Apparent violations were somewhat less common among government-operated retailers (75%) than private retailers (97%). Age verification was absent on 8.5% of websites, all of which were privately operated. Inducement-related content was most common apparent violation (86%), followed by endorsements or testimonials (46%), lifestyle promotion (23%), youth-appealing content (23%), and health or cosmetic benefit claims (22%). INTERPRETATION: Promotional content that may contravene the Cannabis Act was commonly observed on Canadian cannabis retailer websites. These findings suggest that gaps exist between regulatory standards and online retail practices within Canada's legal cannabis market. As more jurisdictions consider cannabis legalization, this evidence can help inform the development and enforcement of cannabis promotion-related regulations.

International Journal of Drug PolicyVol. 155
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA), St. Francis Xavier University (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Bruyère (CA), Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Bruyère Research Institute
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.