Acute brain dysfunction clusters in COVID-19: a pilot machine learning-based analysis of the COVID-D cohort

PURPOSE: While acute brain dysfunction (ABD, i.e., delirium and coma) is associated with significantly increased morbidity in critically ill patients, it presents with great heterogeneity that poses a challenge for management and prognostication. While machine learning may be promising for subgroup identification, this approach has not yet been applied to COVID-19 patients with ABD. The aim of our study was to identify distinct clusters among critically ill patients with COVID-19 based on ICU admission data and evaluate their association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed an international multicenter database (COVID-D study) of critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave and ABD using clinical features on day 1 of admission as input variables. We applied unsupervised machine learning in a pilot attempt to discover clusters of ABD patients. Hierarchical clustering was performed with a bootstrap-based robustness assessment after dimensionality reduction. Clusters were analyzed for differences in neurological outcomes, mechanical ventilation, and survival. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,631 critically ill COVID-19 patients with ABD, identifying four reproducible clusters with distinct clinical and neurological profiles. Cluster 1 ("mild respiratory failure," n = 335) had the most favorable outcomes, with the shortest duration of delirium (4.13 days) and mechanical ventilation. Cluster 2 ("moderate ARDS," n = 508) showed a comparable delirium incidence but the longest duration (5.18 days). Cluster 3 ("early severe ARDS," n = 161) included patients who underwent prone positioning and mechanical ventilation early from the day of admission, with higher rates of coma (100%), including persistent coma (27.3%). Cluster 4 ("late severe ARDS," n = 475) represented severely ill patients with the longest coma duration (11.2 days) and the lowest delirium-free and coma-free (DFCF) days (4.74), in relation to deep and prolonged sedation. Despite the wide range of ABD durations across four groups, no significantly different 28-day mortality (23.6-38.0, p > 0.78), ICU (15.8-19.2 days range, p = 0.154) and hospital (22.5-26.7 days range, p = 0.259) length of stay were observed among clusters. CONCLUSION: This pilot analysis of ICU admission data from the first COVID-19 wave suggests the existence of clinically distinct clusters among patients with acute brain dysfunction. Differences were observed in the type and duration of delirium and coma, though these did not translate into differences in 28-day survival. This exploratory work may support targeted delirium prevention strategies, but prospective studies are required to determine its clinical utility in modern ICU settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-026-00922-4
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute brain dysfunction clusters in COVID-19: a pilot machine learning-based analysis of the COVID-D cohort

Onur M Orun, Nekane Romero-García, EDUARDO PASSARIELLO, Luis Hurtado et al.
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Acute brain dysfunction clusters in COVID-19: a pilot machine learning-based analysis of the COVID-D cohort

Onur M Orun, Nekane Romero-García, EDUARDO PASSARIELLO, Luis Hurtado, David Fernández-Narro, Carlos Sáez, Juan M. García‐Gómez, C Robba, Pratik Pandharipande, Rameela Raman, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Rafael Badenes, Brenda T. Pun, Víctor Montosa-i-Micó, E. Wesley Ely
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: While acute brain dysfunction (ABD, i.e., delirium and coma) is associated with significantly increased morbidity in critically ill patients, it presents with great heterogeneity that poses a challenge for management and prognostication. While machine learning may be promising for subgroup identification, this approach has not yet been applied to COVID-19 patients with ABD. The aim of our study was to identify distinct clusters among critically ill patients with COVID-19 based on ICU admission data and evaluate their association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed an international multicenter database (COVID-D study) of critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave and ABD using clinical features on day 1 of admission as input variables. We applied unsupervised machine learning in a pilot attempt to discover clusters of ABD patients. Hierarchical clustering was performed with a bootstrap-based robustness assessment after dimensionality reduction. Clusters were analyzed for differences in neurological outcomes, mechanical ventilation, and survival. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,631 critically ill COVID-19 patients with ABD, identifying four reproducible clusters with distinct clinical and neurological profiles. Cluster 1 ("mild respiratory failure," n = 335) had the most favorable outcomes, with the shortest duration of delirium (4.13 days) and mechanical ventilation. Cluster 2 ("moderate ARDS," n = 508) showed a comparable delirium incidence but the longest duration (5.18 days). Cluster 3 ("early severe ARDS," n = 161) included patients who underwent prone positioning and mechanical ventilation early from the day of admission, with higher rates of coma (100%), including persistent coma (27.3%). Cluster 4 ("late severe ARDS," n = 475) represented severely ill patients with the longest coma duration (11.2 days) and the lowest delirium-free and coma-free (DFCF) days (4.74), in relation to deep and prolonged sedation. Despite the wide range of ABD durations across four groups, no significantly different 28-day mortality (23.6-38.0, p > 0.78), ICU (15.8-19.2 days range, p = 0.154) and hospital (22.5-26.7 days range, p = 0.259) length of stay were observed among clusters. CONCLUSION: This pilot analysis of ICU admission data from the first COVID-19 wave suggests the existence of clinically distinct clusters among patients with acute brain dysfunction. Differences were observed in the type and duration of delirium and coma, though these did not translate into differences in 28-day survival. This exploratory work may support targeted delirium prevention strategies, but prospective studies are required to determine its clinical utility in modern ICU settings.

Intensive Care Medicine ExperimentalVol. 14(1)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Universitat de València (ES), Vanderbilt University (US), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (ES), Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (US), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES), University of Genoa (IT), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), Menéndez Pelayo International University (ES)
Conselleria de Sanitat Universal i Salut Pública
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.