A call to action for the use of composite hematologic measurements in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and other chronic bleeding disorders

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic development in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), the second-most-common inherited bleeding disorder, is rapidly accelerating. Therefore, modern clinical trials in HHT must be equipped with rigorous, fit-for-purpose endpoints. AREAS COVERED: Due to the inadequacy of solitary hematologic measurements (hemoglobin, red cell transfusions and quantity of iron infused used as separate measurements), the recent International Consensus Report on Standardization in HHT advised widespread implementation of two composite hematologic measurements, the Hematologic Support Score and Hematologic Impact Score. The Hematologic Support Score is a composite measurement of total hematologic support (red cell transfusions and quantity of iron infused) administered over a time period, and the Hematologic Impact Score provides the total hematologic impact of an intervention, in red-cell unit equivalents, by integrating change in hemoglobin, red cell transfusions, and quantity of iron infused. EXPERT OPINION: This article, authored by 16 hematologist-experts in HHT, hemostasis, and iron deficiency, explains these measures in depth and the importance of their implementation in clinical studies of major disorders of chronic bleeding, such as HHT, gastrointestinal angiodysplasia, and heavy menstrual bleeding. We urge clinicians, investigators, study sponsors and regulatory bodies to adopt and promote the use of these common-sense measurements in clinical studies of chronic bleeding interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Review of Hematology
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2026.2686409
Primary Topic
Vascular Anomalies and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A call to action for the use of composite hematologic measurements in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and other chronic bleeding disorders

Senthil Sukumar, Raj S. Kasthuri, Quentin Van Thillo, Magdalena Lewandowska et al.
Expert Review of Hematology
Vascular Anomalies and Treatments
article

A call to action for the use of composite hematologic measurements in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and other chronic bleeding disorders

Senthil Sukumar, Raj S. Kasthuri, Quentin Van Thillo, Magdalena Lewandowska, Layla N Van Doren, Dr Bryan Sisk, Jenny Y. Zhou, Hanny Al-Samkari, Patrick Foy, Allyson M. Pishko, Ibrahim Ibrahim, Kenneth S. Cohen, Keith R. McCrae, Diana M. Byrnes, Bethany T. Samuelson Bannow, Adrienne Hammill
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic development in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), the second-most-common inherited bleeding disorder, is rapidly accelerating. Therefore, modern clinical trials in HHT must be equipped with rigorous, fit-for-purpose endpoints. AREAS COVERED: Due to the inadequacy of solitary hematologic measurements (hemoglobin, red cell transfusions and quantity of iron infused used as separate measurements), the recent International Consensus Report on Standardization in HHT advised widespread implementation of two composite hematologic measurements, the Hematologic Support Score and Hematologic Impact Score. The Hematologic Support Score is a composite measurement of total hematologic support (red cell transfusions and quantity of iron infused) administered over a time period, and the Hematologic Impact Score provides the total hematologic impact of an intervention, in red-cell unit equivalents, by integrating change in hemoglobin, red cell transfusions, and quantity of iron infused. EXPERT OPINION: This article, authored by 16 hematologist-experts in HHT, hemostasis, and iron deficiency, explains these measures in depth and the importance of their implementation in clinical studies of major disorders of chronic bleeding, such as HHT, gastrointestinal angiodysplasia, and heavy menstrual bleeding. We urge clinicians, investigators, study sponsors and regulatory bodies to adopt and promote the use of these common-sense measurements in clinical studies of chronic bleeding interventions.

Expert Review of Hematology
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Harvard University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Yale University (US), University of California San Diego (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Chicago Medical Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Indiana Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Cincinnati (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Vascular Anomalies and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.