More harm than good? The <scp>UK</scp> National Screening Committee's latest review of prostate cancer screening

Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer in men but there is no national screening programme in the UK or in most other countries. The UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) is the independent advisory body responsible for providing evidence-based recommendations to ministers in the four UK nations regarding screening programmes. Following the expansion of its remit to include targeted screening (2022) and the publication of new long-term trial data, the UK NSC launched a comprehensive review of prostate cancer screening in 2025. To inform this review, a bespoke economic model was commissioned, drawing on best available evidence and input from clinicians, technical experts, and patient representatives. The model evaluated whole-population screening and targeted strategies for men at higher risk. Based on the modelling study and consultation with stakeholders, the UK NSC recommended against whole-population screening and screening in most targeted groups. The UK NSC has recommended screening for men with a pathogenic BRCA2 variant with a family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer. This was the only group where the UK NSC had confidence that screening would do more good than harm, primarily because prostate cancer tends to be more aggressive in this group. This narrative review describes the process taken by the UK NSC in developing its recommendations and highlights where additional evidence is still needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Urology
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70355
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More harm than good? The UK National Screening Committee's latest review of prostate cancer screening

Talia Boshari, A. W. Anderson, Michael Richards
British Journal of Urology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

More harm than good? The UK National Screening Committee's latest review of prostate cancer screening

Talia Boshari, A. W. Anderson, Michael Richards
article en

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer in men but there is no national screening programme in the UK or in most other countries. The UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) is the independent advisory body responsible for providing evidence-based recommendations to ministers in the four UK nations regarding screening programmes. Following the expansion of its remit to include targeted screening (2022) and the publication of new long-term trial data, the UK NSC launched a comprehensive review of prostate cancer screening in 2025. To inform this review, a bespoke economic model was commissioned, drawing on best available evidence and input from clinicians, technical experts, and patient representatives. The model evaluated whole-population screening and targeted strategies for men at higher risk. Based on the modelling study and consultation with stakeholders, the UK NSC recommended against whole-population screening and screening in most targeted groups. The UK NSC has recommended screening for men with a pathogenic BRCA2 variant with a family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer. This was the only group where the UK NSC had confidence that screening would do more good than harm, primarily because prostate cancer tends to be more aggressive in this group. This narrative review describes the process taken by the UK NSC in developing its recommendations and highlights where additional evidence is still needed.

British Journal of Urology
Department of Health and Social Care (GB), Public Health England (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

More harm than good? The <scp>UK</scp> National Screening Committee's latest review of prostate cancer screening — Talia Boshari, A. W. Anderson, et al. · British Journal of Urology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS