Imagination and the Philosophy of Belonging: Ontological Openness, Creativity, and Human Transformation

This article develops a comprehensive ontological theory of imagination within the broader framework of the Philosophy of Belonging. It argues that imagination is not merely a secondary cognitive faculty or an aesthetic supplement to rationality, but a fundamental mechanism emerging from the incomplete and relational structure of existence itself. The paper situates imagination within a non-ergodic universe characterized by uncertainty, entropy, historical novelty, and irreversible transformation. Under such conditions, imagination becomes indispensable for existential survival, scientific discovery, artistic creation, institutional innovation, religious meaning, and civilizational development. Drawing upon philosophy, phenomenology, cognitive science, psychology, social theory, systems theory, and economics, the article develops an integrative framework connecting imagination to freedom, creativity, scientific modeling, symbolic systems, and historical transformation. The paper also engages critically with contemporary theories of imagination associated with Castoriadis, Ricoeur, Taylor, predictive processing theory, embodied cognition, and existential phenomenology. The Philosophy of Belonging proposes that imagination reflects the ontological openness generated by imperfect belonging. Human beings imagine because reality itself remains unfinished.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20598375
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Imagination and the Philosophy of Belonging: Ontological Openness, Creativity, and Human Transformation

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
preprint

Imagination and the Philosophy of Belonging: Ontological Openness, Creativity, and Human Transformation

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz
preprint en

Abstract

This article develops a comprehensive ontological theory of imagination within the broader framework of the Philosophy of Belonging. It argues that imagination is not merely a secondary cognitive faculty or an aesthetic supplement to rationality, but a fundamental mechanism emerging from the incomplete and relational structure of existence itself. The paper situates imagination within a non-ergodic universe characterized by uncertainty, entropy, historical novelty, and irreversible transformation. Under such conditions, imagination becomes indispensable for existential survival, scientific discovery, artistic creation, institutional innovation, religious meaning, and civilizational development. Drawing upon philosophy, phenomenology, cognitive science, psychology, social theory, systems theory, and economics, the article develops an integrative framework connecting imagination to freedom, creativity, scientific modeling, symbolic systems, and historical transformation. The paper also engages critically with contemporary theories of imagination associated with Castoriadis, Ricoeur, Taylor, predictive processing theory, embodied cognition, and existential phenomenology. The Philosophy of Belonging proposes that imagination reflects the ontological openness generated by imperfect belonging. Human beings imagine because reality itself remains unfinished.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.