Socioeconomic inequalities in health-related quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic: a six-country comparison using the EQ-5D-5 L

PURPOSE: Despite the growing attention to health inequalities, there is no global consensus on how to measure socio-economic status. This study examined inequalities in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic across six countries-China, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US)-using three SES indicators: education level, income, and work status. METHODS: Between April and June 2020, individuals aged 18-75 years old completed a web-based survey. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L Level Sum Score (LSS), where higher scores indicate poorer health. Country-specific differences in LSS across SES groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multiple linear regression models, adjusted for age, gender, and chronic conditions, were used to explore associations between SES indicators and HRQoL. No formal correction for multiple testing was applied. RESULTS: Data from 17,607 respondents were analyzed. In all countries except Italy, individuals with lower education levels reported significantly higher LSS scores. The largest disparity was observed in the UK. In the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, and the US, lower-income groups also had higher LSS scores, while no such differences were observed in China or Italy. Across all countries, unemployed individuals consistently reported worse HRQoL. Regression analyses confirmed that younger age, chronic conditions, and unemployment were strongly associated with poorer HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial SES-related health inequalities in HRQoL were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in the UK. Work status emerged as a particularly strong and consistent predictor across countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality of Life Research
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04285-x
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic inequalities in health-related quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic: a six-country comparison using the EQ-5D-5 L

Joshua M. Bonsel, You‐Shan Feng, M. F. Bas Janssen, Joëlle Eijkens et al.
Quality of Life Research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Socioeconomic inequalities in health-related quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic: a six-country comparison using the EQ-5D-5 L

Joshua M. Bonsel, You‐Shan Feng, M. F. Bas Janssen, Joëlle Eijkens, Erica I. Lubetkin, Juanita A. Haagsma
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the growing attention to health inequalities, there is no global consensus on how to measure socio-economic status. This study examined inequalities in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic across six countries-China, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US)-using three SES indicators: education level, income, and work status. METHODS: Between April and June 2020, individuals aged 18-75 years old completed a web-based survey. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L Level Sum Score (LSS), where higher scores indicate poorer health. Country-specific differences in LSS across SES groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multiple linear regression models, adjusted for age, gender, and chronic conditions, were used to explore associations between SES indicators and HRQoL. No formal correction for multiple testing was applied. RESULTS: Data from 17,607 respondents were analyzed. In all countries except Italy, individuals with lower education levels reported significantly higher LSS scores. The largest disparity was observed in the UK. In the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, and the US, lower-income groups also had higher LSS scores, while no such differences were observed in China or Italy. Across all countries, unemployed individuals consistently reported worse HRQoL. Regression analyses confirmed that younger age, chronic conditions, and unemployment were strongly associated with poorer HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial SES-related health inequalities in HRQoL were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in the UK. Work status emerged as a particularly strong and consistent predictor across countries.

Quality of Life ResearchVol. 35(7)
CUNY School of Law (US), Erasmus MC (NL), University of Tübingen (DE), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
EuroQol Research Foundation
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.