Radiomic and dosiomic machine learning models for predicting radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate machine learning (ML) models developed for predicting radiation-induced oral mucositis (OM) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, emphasizing the contribution of advanced imaging biomarkers such as radiomic and dosiomic features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251075245). The PICOS framework guided the review question and inclusion criteria. Studies developing or validating ML models for OM prediction using radiomic and/or dosiomic data were included. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched up to July 2025. The risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST tool, and models were compared based on predictor types. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 2,311 patients were included. All models incorporated dosimetric predictors, while some used additional radiomic (n = 3), dosiomic (n = 2), contouromic (n = 1), or oral health indices (n = 1). Reported discrimination (AUC) ranged from 0.70 to 0.96, but external validations showed reduced performance (AUC ~ 0.65). High risk of bias was mainly observed in analysis domains due to limited sample sizes and incomplete calibration. CONCLUSION: ML models for OM prediction remain exploratory and are not yet ready for routine clinical implementation due to poor generalizability and calibration issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical & Translational Oncology
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-026-04427-0
Primary Topic
Oral health in cancer treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiomic and dosiomic machine learning models for predicting radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review

Michele Di Benedetto, Raquel Molina Sanches, Lukas Mendes de Abreu, Kellen Cristine Tjioe et al.
Clinical & Translational Oncology
Oral health in cancer treatment
article

Radiomic and dosiomic machine learning models for predicting radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review

Michele Di Benedetto, Raquel Molina Sanches, Lukas Mendes de Abreu, Kellen Cristine Tjioe, A M B de Oliveira, Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen, Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate machine learning (ML) models developed for predicting radiation-induced oral mucositis (OM) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, emphasizing the contribution of advanced imaging biomarkers such as radiomic and dosiomic features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251075245). The PICOS framework guided the review question and inclusion criteria. Studies developing or validating ML models for OM prediction using radiomic and/or dosiomic data were included. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched up to July 2025. The risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST tool, and models were compared based on predictor types. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 2,311 patients were included. All models incorporated dosimetric predictors, while some used additional radiomic (n = 3), dosiomic (n = 2), contouromic (n = 1), or oral health indices (n = 1). Reported discrimination (AUC) ranged from 0.70 to 0.96, but external validations showed reduced performance (AUC ~ 0.65). High risk of bias was mainly observed in analysis domains due to limited sample sizes and incomplete calibration. CONCLUSION: ML models for OM prediction remain exploratory and are not yet ready for routine clinical implementation due to poor generalizability and calibration issues.

Clinical & Translational Oncology
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Augusta University (US)
Universidade de São Paulo
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Oral health in cancer treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.