Surgical Carbon Footprint Auditing Tool for Less Emissions (SCALE): an evidence-based nationwide cross-sectional assessment to reduce the environmental impact of the operating room

Background: The healthcare sector significantly contributes to global carbon emissions, and operating rooms (ORs) are particularly resource-intensive environments. ORs are therefore potentially impactful targets for emission reduction. Growing knowledge of carbon footprint hotspots in surgery should be integrated into a systematic approach to mitigate the environmental impact of ORs. Materials and methods: We developed the Surgical Carbon Footprint Auditing Tool for Less Emissions (SCALE), an evidence-based model combining published life cycle assessments with real-world surgical practice to quantify OR-related carbon emissions and high-impact mitigation strategies. A questionnaire assessing qualitative and quantitative aspects of surgical practice was distributed to 60 Dutch hospitals. Collected data were incorporated into the model to calculate the carbon footprint and mitigation potential of individual ORs. Ten priority interventions were provided to each surgical center. All data were combined to establish a national baseline. Results: Forty surgical centers (594 ORs) completed the questionnaires. The model consisted of defined variables on surgical practice in five categories, including less-emitting alternatives for carbon footprint calculations: (1) organization and reporting, (2) energy, (3) anesthetics, (4) medical products, and (5) decontamination. Implementation of sustainable practices could reduce emissions by 76.3%, saving a mean of 729.9 kg CO 2 -eq/week per OR. The six most impactful interventions, accounting for over 95% of the achievable reduction, were the transition to renewable energy, phase-out of nitrous oxide and desflurane, use of vapor capture technology and end-tidal control, adoption of heat recapture technology, and use of reusable sterile gowns. Conclusion: SCALE provides a framework to reduce the carbon footprint of surgical practice by identifying effective measures at the hospital and national levels in the Netherlands. By prioritizing these high-impact strategies, SCALE facilitates progress toward sustainable healthcare. Given the urgency of the climate crisis, yielding rapid and substantial environmental gains with these interventions is crucial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000005449
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical Carbon Footprint Auditing Tool for Less Emissions (SCALE): an evidence-based nationwide cross-sectional assessment to reduce the environmental impact of the operating room

Kim E. van Nieuwenhuizen, Herman J. Friedericy, Kristina Lauche, Julia Borgers et al.
International Journal of Surgery
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Surgical Carbon Footprint Auditing Tool for Less Emissions (SCALE): an evidence-based nationwide cross-sectional assessment to reduce the environmental impact of the operating room

Kim E. van Nieuwenhuizen, Herman J. Friedericy, Kristina Lauche, Julia Borgers, Maelle J. Lustig, Anne C. van der Eijk, Frank Willem Jansen, Joyce M. Duijndam
article en

Abstract

Background: The healthcare sector significantly contributes to global carbon emissions, and operating rooms (ORs) are particularly resource-intensive environments. ORs are therefore potentially impactful targets for emission reduction. Growing knowledge of carbon footprint hotspots in surgery should be integrated into a systematic approach to mitigate the environmental impact of ORs. Materials and methods: We developed the Surgical Carbon Footprint Auditing Tool for Less Emissions (SCALE), an evidence-based model combining published life cycle assessments with real-world surgical practice to quantify OR-related carbon emissions and high-impact mitigation strategies. A questionnaire assessing qualitative and quantitative aspects of surgical practice was distributed to 60 Dutch hospitals. Collected data were incorporated into the model to calculate the carbon footprint and mitigation potential of individual ORs. Ten priority interventions were provided to each surgical center. All data were combined to establish a national baseline. Results: Forty surgical centers (594 ORs) completed the questionnaires. The model consisted of defined variables on surgical practice in five categories, including less-emitting alternatives for carbon footprint calculations: (1) organization and reporting, (2) energy, (3) anesthetics, (4) medical products, and (5) decontamination. Implementation of sustainable practices could reduce emissions by 76.3%, saving a mean of 729.9 kg CO 2 -eq/week per OR. The six most impactful interventions, accounting for over 95% of the achievable reduction, were the transition to renewable energy, phase-out of nitrous oxide and desflurane, use of vapor capture technology and end-tidal control, adoption of heat recapture technology, and use of reusable sterile gowns. Conclusion: SCALE provides a framework to reduce the carbon footprint of surgical practice by identifying effective measures at the hospital and national levels in the Netherlands. By prioritizing these high-impact strategies, SCALE facilitates progress toward sustainable healthcare. Given the urgency of the climate crisis, yielding rapid and substantial environmental gains with these interventions is crucial.

International Journal of Surgery
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.