Canadian Recruits’ Energy Intake During Basic Military Training Did Not Meet Their Energy Requirements

Purpose: Basic Military Training (BMT) consists of physically demanding training with limited opportunities to eat such that recruits’ energy intakes (EI) might not be sufficient to compensate for their high energy requirements (ER). Inadequate EI may significantly impact recruits’ health, physical, and cognitive performance and increase injury risks. This study aimed to compare the average EI to the ER of Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) recruits during BMT. Methods: Average daily EI was assessed 4 days using food photography, a snack questionnaire, and food analysis software. ER was calculated using a prediction equation developed for military personnel using measured fat-free mass and estimated physical activity level based on BMT daily activity schedule. Recruits’ EI and ER are presented as means ± standard deviations. Paired t-tests were used to compare recruits’ EI to ER. Results: Thirty-three CAF recruits participated from September to November 2021. Recruits’ average EI over the 4-day period was 3160 ± 681 kcal/day, with mean ER of 4839 ± 735 kcal/day (p < 0.001). Therefore, recruits met about 65% of their ER. Conclusion: CAF recruits’ average EI was significantly lower than their ER over 4 days of BMT. Results can be used to inform evidence-based interventions to reduce energy deficit during BMT to optimize recruits’ health and performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2026-012
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canadian Recruits’ Energy Intake During Basic Military Training Did Not Meet Their Energy Requirements

Heïdi Boilard, Raphaëlle Laroche-Nantel, Isabelle Giroux
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Canadian Recruits’ Energy Intake During Basic Military Training Did Not Meet Their Energy Requirements

Heïdi Boilard, Raphaëlle Laroche-Nantel, Isabelle Giroux
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Basic Military Training (BMT) consists of physically demanding training with limited opportunities to eat such that recruits’ energy intakes (EI) might not be sufficient to compensate for their high energy requirements (ER). Inadequate EI may significantly impact recruits’ health, physical, and cognitive performance and increase injury risks. This study aimed to compare the average EI to the ER of Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) recruits during BMT. Methods: Average daily EI was assessed 4 days using food photography, a snack questionnaire, and food analysis software. ER was calculated using a prediction equation developed for military personnel using measured fat-free mass and estimated physical activity level based on BMT daily activity schedule. Recruits’ EI and ER are presented as means ± standard deviations. Paired t-tests were used to compare recruits’ EI to ER. Results: Thirty-three CAF recruits participated from September to November 2021. Recruits’ average EI over the 4-day period was 3160 ± 681 kcal/day, with mean ER of 4839 ± 735 kcal/day (p < 0.001). Therefore, recruits met about 65% of their ER. Conclusion: CAF recruits’ average EI was significantly lower than their ER over 4 days of BMT. Results can be used to inform evidence-based interventions to reduce energy deficit during BMT to optimize recruits’ health and performance.

Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Department of National Defence (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), Nutrition Sciences (Belgium) (BE), Institut du Savoir Montfort (CA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.