THE INVERTED FRACTAL UNIVERSE OF BLAIR D. MACDONALD: a critical–propositional analysis in confrontation with the modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Blair D. Macdonald’s paper Experiment on Inverted Fractal Corresponds with Cosmological Observations and Conjectures (2024), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Macdonald proposes that the universe may be understood not merely as containing fractal structures at certain scales, but as a growing inverted fractal whose internal observation can reproduce features associated with contemporary cosmology, including accelerated expansion, the Hubble–Lemaître law, large-scale smoothness, and structural differentiation across cosmic scales. The present study examines this hypothesis in confrontation with the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, especially the axioms of boundary, infinity, recursive composition, observation, and transcendent informational substance. It also articulates Macdonald’s model with the phenomenic elements of TO, the Expansive and Reductive Inducer Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, and the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. Particular attention is given to the possibility of reading fractal geometry as a later geometric-operational manifestation of recursive composition and boundary multiplication, rather than as an ultimate ontological foundation of the universe. The analysis argues that Macdonald’s inverted fractal model offers a strong field of dialogue with TO, especially because of its emphasis on recursion, internal observation, structured expansion, and the critique of absolute homogeneity and isotropy. However, the article also identifies important tensions: the absence of a modal ontology of Nothingness, the lack of a theory of the element, the absence of triadic observation, and the need for a deeper informational/radiative interpretation of transcendence. In TO, the transcendent element is interpreted as the knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Blair D. Macdonald; inverted fractal; fractal cosmology; modal ontology; cosmic expansion; Hubble–Lemaître law; cosmological principle; boundary; recursive composition; Inducer Effects; cosmogonic theorem; cosmological Eras; informational transcendence; atomic radiation; ChatGPT.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20599774
Primary Topic
Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE INVERTED FRACTAL UNIVERSE OF BLAIR D. MACDONALD: a critical–propositional analysis in confrontation with the modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
article

THE INVERTED FRACTAL UNIVERSE OF BLAIR D. MACDONALD: a critical–propositional analysis in confrontation with the modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Blair D. Macdonald’s paper Experiment on Inverted Fractal Corresponds with Cosmological Observations and Conjectures (2024), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Macdonald proposes that the universe may be understood not merely as containing fractal structures at certain scales, but as a growing inverted fractal whose internal observation can reproduce features associated with contemporary cosmology, including accelerated expansion, the Hubble–Lemaître law, large-scale smoothness, and structural differentiation across cosmic scales. The present study examines this hypothesis in confrontation with the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, especially the axioms of boundary, infinity, recursive composition, observation, and transcendent informational substance. It also articulates Macdonald’s model with the phenomenic elements of TO, the Expansive and Reductive Inducer Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, and the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. Particular attention is given to the possibility of reading fractal geometry as a later geometric-operational manifestation of recursive composition and boundary multiplication, rather than as an ultimate ontological foundation of the universe. The analysis argues that Macdonald’s inverted fractal model offers a strong field of dialogue with TO, especially because of its emphasis on recursion, internal observation, structured expansion, and the critique of absolute homogeneity and isotropy. However, the article also identifies important tensions: the absence of a modal ontology of Nothingness, the lack of a theory of the element, the absence of triadic observation, and the need for a deeper informational/radiative interpretation of transcendence. In TO, the transcendent element is interpreted as the knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Blair D. Macdonald; inverted fractal; fractal cosmology; modal ontology; cosmic expansion; Hubble–Lemaître law; cosmological principle; boundary; recursive composition; Inducer Effects; cosmogonic theorem; cosmological Eras; informational transcendence; atomic radiation; ChatGPT.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.