Antecedents and consequences of different indicators of engagement with a digital intervention for tobacco cessation
Mobile apps are commonly used to deliver digital interventions, typically through prompts that encourage engagement with intervention contents. However, engagement with these interventions remains suboptimal. A recent organizing framework conceptualizes digital interventions as a sequence of stimuli/tasks, underscoring the importance of measuring engagement with each stimulus/task separately. We applied this framework to a tobacco cessation intervention study that used an app to deliver prompts for practicing self-regulatory strategies. We found that engagement with certain stimuli/tasks (e.g., messages describing a low-effort strategy) declined over time, whereas engagement with others (e.g., messages recommending a more effortful strategy) remained stable. Initiating a brief in-app survey prior to prompting increased the likelihood of engaging with the intervention prompt, but not with subsequent messages or recommended strategies. These findings support conceptualizing engagement as a dynamic, multistage process and offer practical insights for optimizing engagement with digital interventions.
Authors
- Qinggang Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-2464)
- Dusti R. Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9060-7046)
- Carolyn Yoon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-7708)
- Cho Y. Lam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9926-4361)
- Lindsey N. Potter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6681-8145)
- Jamie Yap (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0899-7146)
- David W. Wetter
- John J. Dziak
- Inbal Nahum-Shani
Institutions
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Huntsman Cancer Institute (US)
- Ross School (US)
- Utah Department of Health (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- npj Digital Medicine
- Published
- 2026-06-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02840-x
- Primary Topic
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Institutes of Health