Complementary Error Patterns Between Human Evaluators and GPT-4o in Video-Based Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Assessment: Implications for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Second Reading

Background/Objectives: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill assessments are susceptible to evaluator subjectivity, cognitive fatigue, and observational limitations. Although recent advances in multimodal artificial intelligence have increased the possibility of automated video-based assessment, its validity for clinical skill evaluation remains insufficiently examined. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 130 laypersons who underwent Basic Life Support training and skill testing. Twenty recordings were used for prompt development and 110 recordings were analyzed. Expert evaluators and GPT-4o independently assessed participants’ skills using a 12-item checklist. The manikin sensor data were the reference standard for the four chest compression metrics. Agreement was evaluated using Gwet’s agreement coefficient 1 (AC1) and intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were compared using McNemar’s test. Results: Procedural items such as confirming cardiac arrest, calling 119, and requesting an automated external defibrillator showed a near-perfect agreement between experts and GPT-4o (AC1 > 0.8). However, the agreement was poor for the compression depth (AC1 = 0.374) and full chest recoil (AC1 = 0.355). Experts demonstrated high sensitivity (77.8–84.3%) but low specificity (24.6–47.8%), whereas GPT-4o showed low sensitivity (35.6–40.6%) but high specificity (69.2–76.1%). Conclusions: GPT-4o cannot serve as a standalone evaluator because of its inherent limitations in inferring three-dimensional spatial information from two-dimensional videos. However, its high agreement on procedural items and complementary error patterns with that of human evaluators on compression metrics suggests its potential as a decision support tool to mitigate expert leniency bias in CPR education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124436
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complementary Error Patterns Between Human Evaluators and GPT-4o in Video-Based Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Assessment: Implications for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Second Reading

Daun Choi, Choung Ah Lee, Hye Ji Park
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Complementary Error Patterns Between Human Evaluators and GPT-4o in Video-Based Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Assessment: Implications for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Second Reading

Daun Choi, Choung Ah Lee, Hye Ji Park
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill assessments are susceptible to evaluator subjectivity, cognitive fatigue, and observational limitations. Although recent advances in multimodal artificial intelligence have increased the possibility of automated video-based assessment, its validity for clinical skill evaluation remains insufficiently examined. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 130 laypersons who underwent Basic Life Support training and skill testing. Twenty recordings were used for prompt development and 110 recordings were analyzed. Expert evaluators and GPT-4o independently assessed participants’ skills using a 12-item checklist. The manikin sensor data were the reference standard for the four chest compression metrics. Agreement was evaluated using Gwet’s agreement coefficient 1 (AC1) and intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were compared using McNemar’s test. Results: Procedural items such as confirming cardiac arrest, calling 119, and requesting an automated external defibrillator showed a near-perfect agreement between experts and GPT-4o (AC1 > 0.8). However, the agreement was poor for the compression depth (AC1 = 0.374) and full chest recoil (AC1 = 0.355). Experts demonstrated high sensitivity (77.8–84.3%) but low specificity (24.6–47.8%), whereas GPT-4o showed low sensitivity (35.6–40.6%) but high specificity (69.2–76.1%). Conclusions: GPT-4o cannot serve as a standalone evaluator because of its inherent limitations in inferring three-dimensional spatial information from two-dimensional videos. However, its high agreement on procedural items and complementary error patterns with that of human evaluators on compression metrics suggests its potential as a decision support tool to mitigate expert leniency bias in CPR education.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(12)
Hallym University (KR), Samsung Pharm (South Korea) (KR), Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital (KR)
Hallym University Medical Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.