Diagnostic Utility of endoscopic crush cytology in gastrointestinal malignancies

Introduction Gastrointestinal cancers represent one of the most pressing global public health challenges, accounting to nearly one-third of all cancer related mortality worldwide. Cytologic evaluation allows rapid interpretation and triaging of material. Crush cytology is an added asset to histology to maximize diagnostic accuracy and accelerate decision making for the management of these lesions. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of endoscopic crush cytology in gastrointestinal tract lesions. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on gastrointestinal crush cytology samples received at department of pathology from January 2019 to December 2024. These cases were cytologically categorised across various GI sites as follows, negative for malignancy, atypical favors reactive, atypical suspicious for malignancy and positive for malignancy. The corresponding biopsy slides were reviewed and documented. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Results During the study period, we reviewed 303 cases of GI crush cytology. The mean age at presentation was 60 years (age range - 17 to 90 years) with a male to female ratio of 2:1. These cases were categorized into upper GI with 151 (49.8%) cases and lower GI with 152 (50.2%) cases. The most common site of involvement was colorectal with 146 (48.2%) cases followed by gastric region with 58 (19.1%) cases and oesophagus with 31 (10.2%) cases. Negative for malignancy accounts for 7 (2.3%) cases, atypical favors reactive accounts for 120 (39.6%) cases, atypical suspicious for malignancy accounts for 4 (1.3%) cases, and positive for malignancy accounts for 172 (56.8%) cases across the GI region. Histopathology correlation was available in 179 (59.1%) cases. The overall GI crush cytology sensitivity was 96.1%, specificity was 96.2%, positive predictive value was 98.4%, negative predictive value was 90.9% and the diagnostic accuracy was 96.1%. The Youden's index was 0.9222, and the p value was <0.001(χ2). Conclusion Crush cytology is a highly sensitive, specific, rapid, and cost-effective technique for diagnosing gastrointestinal malignancies in endoscopically suspected malignant lesions. It is a valuable complement to histology, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and accelerating decision-making to manage these lesions. The present study highlights the significant diagnostic utility of crush cytology by demonstrating high sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy, particularly in detecting adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Cytologica
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000552792
Primary Topic
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Utility of endoscopic crush cytology in gastrointestinal malignancies

Rakshatha Nayak, Hema Kini, P Suresh, Akhil Kocherlakota et al.
Acta Cytologica
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
article

Diagnostic Utility of endoscopic crush cytology in gastrointestinal malignancies

Rakshatha Nayak, Hema Kini, P Suresh, Akhil Kocherlakota, Dinesh Kumar Ambati, Sridevi H. Basavaiah, Jyoti R. Kini, Ranjita Devi Chongtham
article en

Abstract

Introduction Gastrointestinal cancers represent one of the most pressing global public health challenges, accounting to nearly one-third of all cancer related mortality worldwide. Cytologic evaluation allows rapid interpretation and triaging of material. Crush cytology is an added asset to histology to maximize diagnostic accuracy and accelerate decision making for the management of these lesions. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of endoscopic crush cytology in gastrointestinal tract lesions. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on gastrointestinal crush cytology samples received at department of pathology from January 2019 to December 2024. These cases were cytologically categorised across various GI sites as follows, negative for malignancy, atypical favors reactive, atypical suspicious for malignancy and positive for malignancy. The corresponding biopsy slides were reviewed and documented. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Results During the study period, we reviewed 303 cases of GI crush cytology. The mean age at presentation was 60 years (age range - 17 to 90 years) with a male to female ratio of 2:1. These cases were categorized into upper GI with 151 (49.8%) cases and lower GI with 152 (50.2%) cases. The most common site of involvement was colorectal with 146 (48.2%) cases followed by gastric region with 58 (19.1%) cases and oesophagus with 31 (10.2%) cases. Negative for malignancy accounts for 7 (2.3%) cases, atypical favors reactive accounts for 120 (39.6%) cases, atypical suspicious for malignancy accounts for 4 (1.3%) cases, and positive for malignancy accounts for 172 (56.8%) cases across the GI region. Histopathology correlation was available in 179 (59.1%) cases. The overall GI crush cytology sensitivity was 96.1%, specificity was 96.2%, positive predictive value was 98.4%, negative predictive value was 90.9% and the diagnostic accuracy was 96.1%. The Youden's index was 0.9222, and the p value was <0.001(χ2). Conclusion Crush cytology is a highly sensitive, specific, rapid, and cost-effective technique for diagnosing gastrointestinal malignancies in endoscopically suspected malignant lesions. It is a valuable complement to histology, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and accelerating decision-making to manage these lesions. The present study highlights the significant diagnostic utility of crush cytology by demonstrating high sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy, particularly in detecting adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas.

Acta Cytologica
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.