Patient-Reported Barriers to Care in Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a disabling condition associated with prolonged diagnostic delays and fragmented care pathways. We sought to characterize patient-reported barriers to spinal CSF leak care and to identify factors associated with adverse financial, employment, and emotional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, anonymous online survey of adults with confirmed or suspected spinal CSF leak. Survey domains included diagnostic timelines, clinician encounters, referral pathways, structural barriers, and socioeconomic and emotional outcomes. Primary analyses were performed in respondents who completed all survey sections. Multivariable logistic and ordinal regression models identified predictors of financial worsening, employment disruption, and emotional wellbeing. RESULTS: Among 691 responses, 93.8% reported clinician-confirmed diagnosis and 60.9% remained symptomatic. Timelines were prolonged; 31.1% reported spinal CSF leak suspicion within 3 months, while 17.4% of respondents reported delays of over 4 years. Misdiagnosis occurred in 78%, and respondents saw a median of 6.5 clinicians. Financial worsening occurred in 74.2% and employment disruption in 67.6%. Multivariable analysis showed positive imaging was protective against financial worsening (aOR 0.55 [95% CI 0.35-0.87], p = .01), while each additional clinician increased odds of financial worsening (aOR 1.05 [95% CI 1.02-1.08], p = .003) and of employment disruption (aOR 1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.06], p = .01). Post-lumbar puncture leak carried >2-fold higher odds of employment disruption (aOR 2.34 [95% CI 1.23-4.45], p = .01). CSF-venous fistula had the longest timelines, with 21.9% waiting >4 years for a first procedure. Delays of >4 years independently increased odds of financial worsening (OR 1.80 [95% CI 1.05-3.08], p= .03). Wait-related access barriers (63.6%) were independently associated with self-harm ideation. Poorly managed emotional states were reported by 42.0%; caregiver support (OR 0.41 [95% CI 0.26-0.65], p < .001) and physician acknowledgment (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.66-0.91], p = .002) were independently associated with improved emotional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with spinal CSF leak experience substantial diagnostic delay and fragmented care, with measurable downstream financial, occupational, and emotional consequences. Diagnostic burden and access barriers, rather than disease characteristics alone, are key drivers of adverse outcomes, while objective imaging confirmation and supportive clinical and caregiver interactions appear protective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9459
Primary Topic
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-Reported Barriers to Care in Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Maisie Smith, Jodi Ettenberg, Andrew L. Callen, Aubrey Bolan et al.
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
article

Patient-Reported Barriers to Care in Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Maisie Smith, Jodi Ettenberg, Andrew L. Callen, Aubrey Bolan, Kyle Spawn, Daniel Montes
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a disabling condition associated with prolonged diagnostic delays and fragmented care pathways. We sought to characterize patient-reported barriers to spinal CSF leak care and to identify factors associated with adverse financial, employment, and emotional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, anonymous online survey of adults with confirmed or suspected spinal CSF leak. Survey domains included diagnostic timelines, clinician encounters, referral pathways, structural barriers, and socioeconomic and emotional outcomes. Primary analyses were performed in respondents who completed all survey sections. Multivariable logistic and ordinal regression models identified predictors of financial worsening, employment disruption, and emotional wellbeing. RESULTS: Among 691 responses, 93.8% reported clinician-confirmed diagnosis and 60.9% remained symptomatic. Timelines were prolonged; 31.1% reported spinal CSF leak suspicion within 3 months, while 17.4% of respondents reported delays of over 4 years. Misdiagnosis occurred in 78%, and respondents saw a median of 6.5 clinicians. Financial worsening occurred in 74.2% and employment disruption in 67.6%. Multivariable analysis showed positive imaging was protective against financial worsening (aOR 0.55 [95% CI 0.35-0.87], p = .01), while each additional clinician increased odds of financial worsening (aOR 1.05 [95% CI 1.02-1.08], p = .003) and of employment disruption (aOR 1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.06], p = .01). Post-lumbar puncture leak carried >2-fold higher odds of employment disruption (aOR 2.34 [95% CI 1.23-4.45], p = .01). CSF-venous fistula had the longest timelines, with 21.9% waiting >4 years for a first procedure. Delays of >4 years independently increased odds of financial worsening (OR 1.80 [95% CI 1.05-3.08], p= .03). Wait-related access barriers (63.6%) were independently associated with self-harm ideation. Poorly managed emotional states were reported by 42.0%; caregiver support (OR 0.41 [95% CI 0.26-0.65], p < .001) and physician acknowledgment (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.66-0.91], p = .002) were independently associated with improved emotional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with spinal CSF leak experience substantial diagnostic delay and fragmented care, with measurable downstream financial, occupational, and emotional consequences. Diagnostic burden and access barriers, rather than disease characteristics alone, are key drivers of adverse outcomes, while objective imaging confirmation and supportive clinical and caregiver interactions appear protective.

American Journal of Neuroradiology
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.