A comparative study of 2D and 3D modeling of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step using the GEKO turbulence model

This study presents a numerical investigation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step using the RANS-GEKO turbulence model implemented in ANSYS Fluent. Simulations were performed in both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) configurations to assess the influence of flow dimensionality on separation and reattachment characteristics. The distributions of pressure coefficient (Cp) and skin friction coefficient (Cf) were analyzed and compared with experimental data from the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource. The results demonstrate good agreement with experiments, with the 3D model providing more accurate predictions of the recirculation region and reattachment length. The findings confirm that the GEKO model is an effective and reliable approach for simulating complex separated turbulent flows.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2026.26362
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of 2D and 3D modeling of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step using the GEKO turbulence model

Abbosjon Qosimov, Murodil Madaliev, Farangiz Abduxakimova, Mushtariybonu Vohobjonova et al.
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
article

A comparative study of 2D and 3D modeling of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step using the GEKO turbulence model

Abbosjon Qosimov, Murodil Madaliev, Farangiz Abduxakimova, Mushtariybonu Vohobjonova, Asadbek Zokirjonov, Zuxraxon Xashimova, Muxayyo Tuxtasinova
article en

Abstract

This study presents a numerical investigation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step using the RANS-GEKO turbulence model implemented in ANSYS Fluent. Simulations were performed in both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) configurations to assess the influence of flow dimensionality on separation and reattachment characteristics. The distributions of pressure coefficient (Cp) and skin friction coefficient (Cf) were analyzed and compared with experimental data from the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource. The results demonstrate good agreement with experiments, with the 3D model providing more accurate predictions of the recirculation region and reattachment length. The findings confirm that the GEKO model is an effective and reliable approach for simulating complex separated turbulent flows.

Vibroengineering PROCEDIAVol. 62
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative study of 2D and 3D modeling of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step using the GEKO turbulence model — Abbosjon Qosimov, Murodil Madaliev, et al. · Vibroengineering PROCEDIA (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS