“Brain-First” vs. “Body-First” PD: Definitions and Implications in Everyday Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review

(1) Background and Objectives: Parkinson’s disease’s (PD) underlying pathophysiology still remains incompletely understood, with Braak’s hypothesis of ASyn pathology propagation being the most widely accepted. Recently, a novel model has been introduced, proposing two distinct ASyn propagation pathways: a bottom-up trajectory termed Body-first PD, and a central nervous system (CNS)-initiated pathway termed Brain-first PD. This distinction introduces new perspectives in the PD literature landscape regarding diagnosis, prognostic factors and patient management. This study set out to systematically synthesize the current literature comparing Brain-first and Body-first PD, with a focus on clinical characteristics and disease progression, diagnostic biomarkers, and management approaches. (2) Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in March 2025 using PubMed, Cochrane Library, DOAJ and Google Scholar. Human observational, diagnostic, and interventional studies published between 2019 and March 2025, including patients with de novo or early PD, were eligible. Pre-motor REM sleep behavioral disorder (RBD) was used as the primary differentiation criterion. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists. Results were synthesized using a narrative approach. (3) Results: Sixteen studies comprising 2107 PD patients met the inclusion criteria. Body-first PD was associated with a higher non-motor symptom (NMS) burden, faster disease progression, and a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment. Additionally, Body-first PD patients exhibited more widespread and symmetrical neurodegeneration, along with electrophysiological and metabolic differences. Distinct biomarker and microbiome profiles were also observed between subtypes. No eligible studies addressing management approaches were identified. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, the available evidence suggests that Brain-first and Body-first PD may represent two distinct pathophysiological entities, a proposal with great significance for the diagnosis, prognosis and management of PD patients. However, the predominantly cross-sectional nature of the current literature limits causal inference. Future longitudinal and interventional studies are required to clarify the potential clinical implications of this subtype classification theory.