Multi-driver biodiversity impact assessment reveals hidden hotspots in institutional consumption

Abstract Food production is one of the leading drivers of global biodiversity loss. Because food is traded internationally, the biodiversity costs of what we eat are often displaced to distant regions, and the same agricultural pressure causes vastly different levels of harm depending on the ecological sensitivity of the local environment. Here we apply an origin-resolved, multi-driver biodiversity footprint approach to one full year of food procurement records from a German institutional canteen, tracking each product consumed back to its origin of production and quantifying impacts weighted by the ecological sensitivity of each sourcing location. We show that accounting for origin substantially changes which products and places appear most harmful compared to global average approaches, and that a small number of specific commodity–region -driver combinations are responsible for a disproportionate share of total impact. These findings demonstrate that credible biodiversity assessments require origin-resolved, multi-driver approaches, and that effective mitigation must target specific commodities and sourcing regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Sustainability
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44458-026-00099-7
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-driver biodiversity impact assessment reveals hidden hotspots in institutional consumption

Jan Lask, Valentin Specht
Communications Sustainability
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Multi-driver biodiversity impact assessment reveals hidden hotspots in institutional consumption

Jan Lask, Valentin Specht
article en

Abstract

Abstract Food production is one of the leading drivers of global biodiversity loss. Because food is traded internationally, the biodiversity costs of what we eat are often displaced to distant regions, and the same agricultural pressure causes vastly different levels of harm depending on the ecological sensitivity of the local environment. Here we apply an origin-resolved, multi-driver biodiversity footprint approach to one full year of food procurement records from a German institutional canteen, tracking each product consumed back to its origin of production and quantifying impacts weighted by the ecological sensitivity of each sourcing location. We show that accounting for origin substantially changes which products and places appear most harmful compared to global average approaches, and that a small number of specific commodity–region -driver combinations are responsible for a disproportionate share of total impact. These findings demonstrate that credible biodiversity assessments require origin-resolved, multi-driver approaches, and that effective mitigation must target specific commodities and sourcing regions.

Communications SustainabilityVol. 1(1)
University of Hohenheim (DE), German-Russian Interdisciplinary Science Center (DE), Biobase (Germany) (DE)
Universität Hohenheim
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.