Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Grounded in the perspective of language as a high-order cognitive organizer, language engages multiple domains, suggesting that linguistic stimulation may strengthen cognitive resources holistically. Despite its potential for promoting neuroplasticity and mitigating decline, the underlying neural mechanisms and their correlation with behavioral outcomes remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize neuroimaging evidence on the effects of linguistic-cognitive interventions on brain structure and function across the cognitive aging continuum (healthy, SCD, MCI, and AD). METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020, we searched articles produced between 2009 and 2024 with randomized controlled trials evaluating neuroimaging outcomes following linguistic-cognitive interventions. Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Data were independently extracted by four reviewers, and risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0. Neuroimaging modalities included structural measures (VBM, DTI) and functional measures (rs-fMRI, PET). RESULTS: Samples ranged from 30 to 160 participants, aged 64-82 years, with 3.4-17.1 years of education. Six studies reported significant post-intervention brain changes (five functional, one structural). Functional effects were mainly observed in the default mode network, frontoparietal regions, and hippocampal circuits. Structural findings included gray matter increases and improved white matter integrity. Neuroimaging effects were more frequent in MCI/AD and in in-person versus online/hybrid interventions. However, six studies found no significant behavioral improvement despite neural changes. Risk of bias was high in seven studies. CONCLUSIONS: Linguistic-cognitive interventions can modulate brain connectivity and, less consistently, structure in aging. Neuroimaging may be a sensitive biomarker of intervention efficacy, but larger, longitudinal, multimodal trials with ecologically valid outcomes are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain and Cognition
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2026.106444
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review

Lilian Cristine Hübner, Lucas Porcello Schilling, Cristiano Schaffer Aguzzoli, Vanessa Bisol et al.
Brain and Cognition
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review

Lilian Cristine Hübner, Lucas Porcello Schilling, Cristiano Schaffer Aguzzoli, Vanessa Bisol, Bárbara Rusch da Rocha, Gustavo Keunecke Bangemann, Helena Pacheco Helms
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Grounded in the perspective of language as a high-order cognitive organizer, language engages multiple domains, suggesting that linguistic stimulation may strengthen cognitive resources holistically. Despite its potential for promoting neuroplasticity and mitigating decline, the underlying neural mechanisms and their correlation with behavioral outcomes remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize neuroimaging evidence on the effects of linguistic-cognitive interventions on brain structure and function across the cognitive aging continuum (healthy, SCD, MCI, and AD). METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020, we searched articles produced between 2009 and 2024 with randomized controlled trials evaluating neuroimaging outcomes following linguistic-cognitive interventions. Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Data were independently extracted by four reviewers, and risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0. Neuroimaging modalities included structural measures (VBM, DTI) and functional measures (rs-fMRI, PET). RESULTS: Samples ranged from 30 to 160 participants, aged 64-82 years, with 3.4-17.1 years of education. Six studies reported significant post-intervention brain changes (five functional, one structural). Functional effects were mainly observed in the default mode network, frontoparietal regions, and hippocampal circuits. Structural findings included gray matter increases and improved white matter integrity. Neuroimaging effects were more frequent in MCI/AD and in in-person versus online/hybrid interventions. However, six studies found no significant behavioral improvement despite neural changes. Risk of bias was high in seven studies. CONCLUSIONS: Linguistic-cognitive interventions can modulate brain connectivity and, less consistently, structure in aging. Neuroimaging may be a sensitive biomarker of intervention efficacy, but larger, longitudinal, multimodal trials with ecologically valid outcomes are needed.

Brain and CognitionVol. 197
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR), Instituto do Cérebro (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.