Sex-Specific and Time-Dependent Outcomes After TAVR Versus SAVR

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have been reported, but their variation over time and across surgical risk strata remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate sex-specific and time-dependent outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR and the influence of baseline surgical risk. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through January 18, 2026. Randomized controlled trials reporting sex-stratified, mortality-inclusive primary endpoints with ≥1-year follow-up were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using random-effects models, with prespecified analyses by sex and surgical risk and exploratory meta-regression. RESULTS: Nine trials (N = 9,583; 44.2% women) were included. In women, TAVR was associated with lower risk at 1 and 2 years vs SAVR (1 year: RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55-0.81; 2 years: RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69-0.94), with no significant difference at 5 years (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89-1.18). In men, no significant differences were observed across time points. By surgical risk, early benefit with TAVR in women was more evident in intermediate-high-risk patients, whereas at 5 years a higher risk with TAVR was observed in men; no clear sex differences were seen in low-risk patients. Meta-regression showed no significant effect modification by age, surgical risk, or atrial fibrillation prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after aortic valve replacement vary by sex, surgical risk, and time. TAVR was associated with early benefit in women, particularly in intermediate-high-risk patients, with convergence over longer follow-up, whereas men showed no significant differences across time points, with higher risk observed with TAVR at 5 years in intermediate-high-risk patients. (Sex Differences in Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials; CRD420261287967).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Advances
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102856
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex-Specific and Time-Dependent Outcomes After TAVR Versus SAVR

Woosik Han, Ki‐Bum Won, Jinhwan Jo, Seung Ri Kang et al.
JACC Advances
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Sex-Specific and Time-Dependent Outcomes After TAVR Versus SAVR

Woosik Han, Ki‐Bum Won, Jinhwan Jo, Seung Ri Kang, Jun Hwan Cho, Hendrianus Hendrianus, Kyung‐Taek Park, Sang‐Wook Kim, Kang Min Kim, Eun Jeong Cho, Sang Yeub Lee, Gyu Tae Park, Young-Hoon Jeong, Hoyoun Won
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have been reported, but their variation over time and across surgical risk strata remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate sex-specific and time-dependent outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR and the influence of baseline surgical risk. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through January 18, 2026. Randomized controlled trials reporting sex-stratified, mortality-inclusive primary endpoints with ≥1-year follow-up were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using random-effects models, with prespecified analyses by sex and surgical risk and exploratory meta-regression. RESULTS: Nine trials (N = 9,583; 44.2% women) were included. In women, TAVR was associated with lower risk at 1 and 2 years vs SAVR (1 year: RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55-0.81; 2 years: RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69-0.94), with no significant difference at 5 years (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89-1.18). In men, no significant differences were observed across time points. By surgical risk, early benefit with TAVR in women was more evident in intermediate-high-risk patients, whereas at 5 years a higher risk with TAVR was observed in men; no clear sex differences were seen in low-risk patients. Meta-regression showed no significant effect modification by age, surgical risk, or atrial fibrillation prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after aortic valve replacement vary by sex, surgical risk, and time. TAVR was associated with early benefit in women, particularly in intermediate-high-risk patients, with convergence over longer follow-up, whereas men showed no significant differences across time points, with higher risk observed with TAVR at 5 years in intermediate-high-risk patients. (Sex Differences in Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials; CRD420261287967).

JACC AdvancesVol. 5(7)
Sungae Hospital (KR), Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.