Humanlike AI May Strengthen Women’s Agreement With Sexist Stereotypes

AI can influence societally-consequential attitudes by generating biased arguments – but can it influence our attitudes without changing its arguments at all? In four experiments (N = 2,762), we show that the mere presence of humanlike features in an AI chatbot influences women to more strongly accept ideologically-compatible sexist stereotypes, biases that often resist influence and have societal harm. This influence operates indirectly by increasing “mind perception” – the belief that AI is conscious and thinking – which increases perceptions of its trustworthiness. Our contribution is that anthropomorphism’s influence extends beyond increased trust toward AI itself, impacting women’s broader attitudes about their competence and status. This influence happens when women are attentive during conversations with AI. As developers add more anthropomorphic features to AI, the harms of stereotypes it repeats will increase for vulnerable groups – but making AI appear less humanlike can mitigate this risk.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-09-14
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Humanlike AI May Strengthen Women’s Agreement With Sexist Stereotypes

Lior Zalmanson, Sterling Williams-Ceci, Rachel Minkowitz, Mor Naaman et al.
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
AI in Service Interactions
preprint

Humanlike AI May Strengthen Women’s Agreement With Sexist Stereotypes

Lior Zalmanson, Sterling Williams-Ceci, Rachel Minkowitz, Mor Naaman, Michael MACY
preprint en

Abstract

AI can influence societally-consequential attitudes by generating biased arguments – but can it influence our attitudes without changing its arguments at all? In four experiments (N = 2,762), we show that the mere presence of humanlike features in an AI chatbot influences women to more strongly accept ideologically-compatible sexist stereotypes, biases that often resist influence and have societal harm. This influence operates indirectly by increasing “mind perception” – the belief that AI is conscious and thinking – which increases perceptions of its trustworthiness. Our contribution is that anthropomorphism’s influence extends beyond increased trust toward AI itself, impacting women’s broader attitudes about their competence and status. This influence happens when women are attentive during conversations with AI. As developers add more anthropomorphic features to AI, the harms of stereotypes it repeats will increase for vulnerable groups – but making AI appear less humanlike can mitigate this risk.

PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Gender equality
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.