Common Humanity and Resilience: A Scoping Review

Objectives: Social support and self-compassion are well-established predictors of resilience across diverse populations and contexts. While the associations between resilience and both social support and self-compassion are well documented in the literature, common humanity—a subcomponent of self-compassion related to social support that involves recognizing the universality of painful experiences—has received comparatively little attention in resilience research. Accordingly, a scoping review was conducted to map the empirical literature on common humanity and resilience, synthesize their associations, and examine definitions and conceptualizations of both constructs.Methods: To identify studies, a search strategy was developed and executed across seven databases. The titles and abstracts as well as the full texts of emerging publications were independently screened by three reviewers. Data from 40 studies that met the inclusion criteria by consensus were extracted and summarized.Results: Among the 4,353 references identified, findings from 40 included studies indicate a consistent positive relationship between common humanity and resilience, with higher common humanity associated with more effective coping, adaptation, and recovery from adversity. Regardless of the definitions and conceptualizations of both common humanity and resilience—as well as differences in geographic location, research type, study population, sample size, or form of adversity under investigation—common humanity consistently evidenced a robust association with resilience. Nevertheless, this relationship varied depending on the constructs examined, the form of adversity studied, the underlying mechanisms, and the conceptualizations of common humanity. These results elucidate the association between common humanity and resilience while identifying the factors that shape this relationship.Conclusions: This scoping review advances knowledge in the field by identifying conceptual and methodological gaps, offering a foundation for future research, and informing the development of interventions that draw on common humanity to enhance resilience.Preregistration A review protocol was developed a priori and registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/rby8e/).Keywords: Common humanity, resilience, adaptation, adversity, scoping review

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-026-00330-9
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common Humanity and Resilience: A Scoping Review

Patrick Labelle, Kiera Young, Milan Le, Jess Whitley et al.
International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Common Humanity and Resilience: A Scoping Review

Patrick Labelle, Kiera Young, Milan Le, Jess Whitley, Sarah McAllister
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Social support and self-compassion are well-established predictors of resilience across diverse populations and contexts. While the associations between resilience and both social support and self-compassion are well documented in the literature, common humanity—a subcomponent of self-compassion related to social support that involves recognizing the universality of painful experiences—has received comparatively little attention in resilience research. Accordingly, a scoping review was conducted to map the empirical literature on common humanity and resilience, synthesize their associations, and examine definitions and conceptualizations of both constructs.Methods: To identify studies, a search strategy was developed and executed across seven databases. The titles and abstracts as well as the full texts of emerging publications were independently screened by three reviewers. Data from 40 studies that met the inclusion criteria by consensus were extracted and summarized.Results: Among the 4,353 references identified, findings from 40 included studies indicate a consistent positive relationship between common humanity and resilience, with higher common humanity associated with more effective coping, adaptation, and recovery from adversity. Regardless of the definitions and conceptualizations of both common humanity and resilience—as well as differences in geographic location, research type, study population, sample size, or form of adversity under investigation—common humanity consistently evidenced a robust association with resilience. Nevertheless, this relationship varied depending on the constructs examined, the form of adversity studied, the underlying mechanisms, and the conceptualizations of common humanity. These results elucidate the association between common humanity and resilience while identifying the factors that shape this relationship.Conclusions: This scoping review advances knowledge in the field by identifying conceptual and methodological gaps, offering a foundation for future research, and informing the development of interventions that draw on common humanity to enhance resilience.Preregistration A review protocol was developed a priori and registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/rby8e/).Keywords: Common humanity, resilience, adaptation, adversity, scoping review

International Journal of Applied Positive PsychologyVol. 11(3)
University of Ottawa (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.