Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain measured by Simoa and Lumipulse: an inter-platform comparison across neurological disorders

Abstract Introduction Blood neurofilament light chain (NfL) is an accessible biomarker of neuroaxonal injury across a broad range of neurological disorders, but its clinical implementation requires robust cross-platform analytical and clinical comparability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical comparability of plasma NfL measurements using Simoa and Lumipulse across different neurological conditions, by assessing cross-platform agreement and the ability of both assays to distinguish neurological diseases from healthy controls. Paired CSF analyses were performed in a subset of participants to biologically anchor plasma findings to the central compartment. Methods 383 individuals were included, comprising healthy controls and patients with neurodegenerative conditions, multiple sclerosis and stroke. Plasma NfL was measured in all participants using both Simoa and Lumipulse, with paired CSF analyses in a subset of 92 individuals. The Lumipulse testing intermediate precision and between-day repeatability was assessed as by the CLSI EP15. Cross-platform agreement for plasma NfL was evaluated using correlation analyses, Passing–Bablok regression and Bland–Altman analysis. Associations between plasma/CSF NfL concentrations were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis for each platform, separately. Age-adjusted cross-diagnostic differences were evaluated using permutation ANCOVA and multiple linear regression models for each platform, separately. Results Plasma NfL measured by Simoa and Lumipulse showed strong cross-platform concordance in the whole cohort (ρ=0.90), with similarly strong concordance observed for CSF NfL in the subset with paired samples (ρ=0.90). Method-comparison analyses in plasma demonstrated consistent agreement between platforms, with identifiable constant and proportional bias, alongside systematically higher absolute plasma NfL values measured by Lumipulse. Within-platform analyses showed significant correlations between plasma and CSF NfL concentrations (ρ=0.72 for Simoa; ρ=0.78 for Lumipulse). Noteworthy, Lumipulse NfL CSF and Blood kits exhibited high precision and analytical accuracy. Across both assays, plasma NfL increased with age and was significantly elevated in patients with neurological disorders compared with healthy controls. Discussion Simoa and Lumipulse capture a consistent biological signal in plasma across patients with neurological disorders, although their absolute NfL values differ, supporting the use of platform-specific reference ranges in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-1045
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain measured by Simoa and Lumipulse: an inter-platform comparison across neurological disorders

Fabrizio Gardoni, Andrea Rizzardi, Elena E. Marcello, Alessandro Magliozzi et al.
5 links
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain measured by Simoa and Lumipulse: an inter-platform comparison across neurological disorders

Fabrizio Gardoni, Andrea Rizzardi, Elena E. Marcello, Alessandro Magliozzi, Rosanna Colao, Nicholas James Ashton, Andrea Pilotto, Loris Poli, Andrea Toja, Chiara Tolassi, Virginia Quaresima, Andrea Morotti, Cinzia Zatti, Simona Giulia Signorini, Irene Volonghi, Eqrem Rusi, Carmelo Rodolico, Salvatore Caratozzolo, Viviana Cristillo, Duilio Brugnoni, Henrik Zetterberg, Ilenia Libri, Alice Galli, Alessandro Padovani, Caterina Martinuzzo, Chiara Trasciatti, Marta Bianchi, Chiara Agosti, Marianna Bertoni, Irene Girotto, Klaudia Eshja, Giulia Foresti, Tommaso Merati, Francesco Berinato, Monica Di Luca, Liberato Stabile, Claudia Pangrazio
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Blood neurofilament light chain (NfL) is an accessible biomarker of neuroaxonal injury across a broad range of neurological disorders, but its clinical implementation requires robust cross-platform analytical and clinical comparability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical comparability of plasma NfL measurements using Simoa and Lumipulse across different neurological conditions, by assessing cross-platform agreement and the ability of both assays to distinguish neurological diseases from healthy controls. Paired CSF analyses were performed in a subset of participants to biologically anchor plasma findings to the central compartment. Methods 383 individuals were included, comprising healthy controls and patients with neurodegenerative conditions, multiple sclerosis and stroke. Plasma NfL was measured in all participants using both Simoa and Lumipulse, with paired CSF analyses in a subset of 92 individuals. The Lumipulse testing intermediate precision and between-day repeatability was assessed as by the CLSI EP15. Cross-platform agreement for plasma NfL was evaluated using correlation analyses, Passing–Bablok regression and Bland–Altman analysis. Associations between plasma/CSF NfL concentrations were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis for each platform, separately. Age-adjusted cross-diagnostic differences were evaluated using permutation ANCOVA and multiple linear regression models for each platform, separately. Results Plasma NfL measured by Simoa and Lumipulse showed strong cross-platform concordance in the whole cohort (ρ=0.90), with similarly strong concordance observed for CSF NfL in the subset with paired samples (ρ=0.90). Method-comparison analyses in plasma demonstrated consistent agreement between platforms, with identifiable constant and proportional bias, alongside systematically higher absolute plasma NfL values measured by Lumipulse. Within-platform analyses showed significant correlations between plasma and CSF NfL concentrations (ρ=0.72 for Simoa; ρ=0.78 for Lumipulse). Noteworthy, Lumipulse NfL CSF and Blood kits exhibited high precision and analytical accuracy. Across both assays, plasma NfL increased with age and was significantly elevated in patients with neurological disorders compared with healthy controls. Discussion Simoa and Lumipulse capture a consistent biological signal in plasma across patients with neurological disorders, although their absolute NfL values differ, supporting the use of platform-specific reference ranges in clinical practice.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
University of Messina (IT), University of Arizona (US), University of Milan (IT), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US), BioAge (Italy) (IT), Banner Alzheimer’s Institute (US), Presidio Ospedaliero Lamezia Terme (IT), University of Brescia (IT), University of Gothenburg (SE)
European Commission
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon