No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus and posterior subthalamic area (VIM/PSA) in Essential Tremor (ET) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are established treatments for tremor. To achieve maximum tremor control, increasing stimulation frequency beyond 130 Hz is part of clinical practice, but lacks scientific evidence. OBJECTIVE: To compare tremor suppression under total electrical energy delivered (TEED)-equivalent stimulation at 130 versus 185 Hz in VIM/PSA-DBS for ET and STN-DBS for PD. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind study, acute DBS effects were assessed in 18 people with ET (n = 29 hemispheres), and 25 people with PD (n = 30 hemispheres). Tremor-suppressive effects, evaluated by accelerometry, were compared with TEED-equivalent stimulation at 130 and 185 Hz using linear mixed-effects models, explorative pairwise comparisons, and equivalency testing. RESULTS: Linear mixed-effects models revealed no significant effect of stimulation frequency on tremor improvement in both cohorts. Pairwise comparisons showed no consistent differences in total tremor improvement with TEED-equivalent 130 Hz vs 185 Hz DBS. Post-hoc equivalence testing confirmed equivalence of stimulation frequencies under TEED-equivalent conditions within a ±20% margin of relative tremor improvement. CONCLUSION: This study provides Level II evidence that a higher stimulation frequency of 185 Hz does not offer additional benefit in deep brain stimulation for tremor in VIM/PSA for Essential Tremor or in the STN for Parkinson's Disease in the acute setting and supports 130 Hz as the standard stimulation frequency for tremor suppression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70886
Primary Topic
Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

Veerle E. R. M. Visser-Vandewalle, Gereon R. Fink, Charlotte Schedlich‐Teufer, Hannah Jergas et al.
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
article

No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

Veerle E. R. M. Visser-Vandewalle, Gereon R. Fink, Charlotte Schedlich‐Teufer, Hannah Jergas, Christina van der Linden, Jan Niklas Petry‐Schmelzer, Till A. Dembek, Michael T. Barbe, Gregor Alexander Brandt, Peer Trapp
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus and posterior subthalamic area (VIM/PSA) in Essential Tremor (ET) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are established treatments for tremor. To achieve maximum tremor control, increasing stimulation frequency beyond 130 Hz is part of clinical practice, but lacks scientific evidence. OBJECTIVE: To compare tremor suppression under total electrical energy delivered (TEED)-equivalent stimulation at 130 versus 185 Hz in VIM/PSA-DBS for ET and STN-DBS for PD. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind study, acute DBS effects were assessed in 18 people with ET (n = 29 hemispheres), and 25 people with PD (n = 30 hemispheres). Tremor-suppressive effects, evaluated by accelerometry, were compared with TEED-equivalent stimulation at 130 and 185 Hz using linear mixed-effects models, explorative pairwise comparisons, and equivalency testing. RESULTS: Linear mixed-effects models revealed no significant effect of stimulation frequency on tremor improvement in both cohorts. Pairwise comparisons showed no consistent differences in total tremor improvement with TEED-equivalent 130 Hz vs 185 Hz DBS. Post-hoc equivalence testing confirmed equivalence of stimulation frequencies under TEED-equivalent conditions within a ±20% margin of relative tremor improvement. CONCLUSION: This study provides Level II evidence that a higher stimulation frequency of 185 Hz does not offer additional benefit in deep brain stimulation for tremor in VIM/PSA for Essential Tremor or in the STN for Parkinson's Disease in the acute setting and supports 130 Hz as the standard stimulation frequency for tremor suppression.

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), University of Cologne (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon