Agreement between Fenton and intergrowth curves in assessing birth weight of preterm infants: Bland-Altman analysis by degree of prematurity and birth weight for gestational age

OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement between the Fenton and INTERGROWTH charts in classifying birth weight for gestational age in preterm infants, considering prematurity degree and small/adequate/large-for-gestational-age (SGA/AGA/LGA) status individually and simultaneously. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 2529 preterm infants admitted between 2018 and 2021. Gestational age was estimated from obstetric data or by the Capurro/Ballard methods. Birth weight-for-gestational-age Z-scores were calculated according to both charts. Agreement was analyzed overall and by subgroups defined by prematurity degree and SGA/AGA/LGA status using the Bland-Altman method, complemented by boxplots. RESULTS: Overall agreement was reasonable (mean bias: -0.08; limits of agreement: -0.67 to 0.50), with slight overestimation of Z-scores by INTERGROWTH. Relevant variability was observed across subgroups. Disagreement extended across all prematurity strata with distinct patterns: greater dispersion in extremely and very preterm infants and more consistent but systematically biased differences in moderate-to-late preterm infants (bias: -0.12). The largest discrepancies occurred among SGA, especially in extremely preterm infants, among whom 50% had Z-scores beyond the limits of agreement. In this subgroup, Fenton tended to assign higher Z-scores, especially between 26 and 32 weeks of gestation, attenuating birth weight deficit severity. Agreement was considerable among AGA and LGA infants, especially in more mature preterm groups. CONCLUSION: Although overall agreement between the charts was acceptable, clinically relevant differences were observed across all prematurity strata, particularly among more immature SGA infants. The charts are not interchangeable at the individual level, and their use may influence nutritional diagnosis and clinical management, reinforcing the importance of consistent and context-appropriate selection of growth reference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jornal de Pediatria
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2026.101575
Primary Topic
Infant Nutrition and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agreement between Fenton and intergrowth curves in assessing birth weight of preterm infants: Bland-Altman analysis by degree of prematurity and birth weight for gestational age

Ana Cecília T Santiago, Crésio de A D Alves, Louise P M da Cunha
Jornal de Pediatria
Infant Nutrition and Health
article

Agreement between Fenton and intergrowth curves in assessing birth weight of preterm infants: Bland-Altman analysis by degree of prematurity and birth weight for gestational age

Ana Cecília T Santiago, Crésio de A D Alves, Louise P M da Cunha
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement between the Fenton and INTERGROWTH charts in classifying birth weight for gestational age in preterm infants, considering prematurity degree and small/adequate/large-for-gestational-age (SGA/AGA/LGA) status individually and simultaneously. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 2529 preterm infants admitted between 2018 and 2021. Gestational age was estimated from obstetric data or by the Capurro/Ballard methods. Birth weight-for-gestational-age Z-scores were calculated according to both charts. Agreement was analyzed overall and by subgroups defined by prematurity degree and SGA/AGA/LGA status using the Bland-Altman method, complemented by boxplots. RESULTS: Overall agreement was reasonable (mean bias: -0.08; limits of agreement: -0.67 to 0.50), with slight overestimation of Z-scores by INTERGROWTH. Relevant variability was observed across subgroups. Disagreement extended across all prematurity strata with distinct patterns: greater dispersion in extremely and very preterm infants and more consistent but systematically biased differences in moderate-to-late preterm infants (bias: -0.12). The largest discrepancies occurred among SGA, especially in extremely preterm infants, among whom 50% had Z-scores beyond the limits of agreement. In this subgroup, Fenton tended to assign higher Z-scores, especially between 26 and 32 weeks of gestation, attenuating birth weight deficit severity. Agreement was considerable among AGA and LGA infants, especially in more mature preterm groups. CONCLUSION: Although overall agreement between the charts was acceptable, clinically relevant differences were observed across all prematurity strata, particularly among more immature SGA infants. The charts are not interchangeable at the individual level, and their use may influence nutritional diagnosis and clinical management, reinforcing the importance of consistent and context-appropriate selection of growth reference.

Jornal de PediatriaVol. 102(5)
Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Infant Nutrition and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.