Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a RECOVA-FASTRACS Realist Evaluation.

Background: Women with breast cancer face many barriers to returning to work (RTW) after their treatment. The Facilitating and Sustaining the Return to Work After Breast Cancer (FASTRACS) intervention aims to facilitate and sustain functional RTW. Objective: The main objective of the RECOVA-FASTRACS (Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors) study is to evaluate the processes using a realist approach that analyzes what works, how, for whom, and under what circumstances. Methods: The RECOVA-FASTRACS study uses a mixed methods design to assess the implementation, context, and impact mechanisms of the FASTRACS intervention. The qualitative analysis will include 2 main components: a trajectory analysis and a focus group assessment. The trajectory analysis will examine the experiences of women who participated in the intervention and key individuals involved in their RTW process. We will use semistructured interviews according to the multiple-case study method. Additionally, to explore organizational and professional practices, focus groups will be conducted with professionals who deliver the intervention. To analyze the trajectories, embedded and iterative integration will combine the qualitative findings with relevant quantitative data from the FASTRACS randomized controlled trial for 5 domains: personal situation, professional situation, RTW, care pathway, intervention tool use, and perceived usefulness. Results: The RECOVA-FASTRACS study received funding in 2022. Recruitment and qualitative data collection began in month 6. Final analyses are expected to be completed by the end of 2026, with dissemination of the main findings anticipated in late 2027. Conclusions: Our mixed methods realist evaluation will provide a detailed analysis of the intervention processes, helping to identify impact mechanisms within specific contexts. This approach is meant to ensure a more informed and realist deployment of the intervention by professionals following the study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/86608
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a RECOVA-FASTRACS Realist Evaluation.

Julien Péron, Jean‐Baptiste Fassier, Sabrina Rouat, Guillaume Broc et al.
PubMed
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a RECOVA-FASTRACS Realist Evaluation.

Julien Péron, Jean‐Baptiste Fassier, Sabrina Rouat, Guillaume Broc, Julien Carretier, P. Drouin, Apolline Blazer, Laure Guittard, Laurent Letrilliart, Béatrice Fervers, Marion Lamort-Bouché
article en

Abstract

Background: Women with breast cancer face many barriers to returning to work (RTW) after their treatment. The Facilitating and Sustaining the Return to Work After Breast Cancer (FASTRACS) intervention aims to facilitate and sustain functional RTW. Objective: The main objective of the RECOVA-FASTRACS (Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors) study is to evaluate the processes using a realist approach that analyzes what works, how, for whom, and under what circumstances. Methods: The RECOVA-FASTRACS study uses a mixed methods design to assess the implementation, context, and impact mechanisms of the FASTRACS intervention. The qualitative analysis will include 2 main components: a trajectory analysis and a focus group assessment. The trajectory analysis will examine the experiences of women who participated in the intervention and key individuals involved in their RTW process. We will use semistructured interviews according to the multiple-case study method. Additionally, to explore organizational and professional practices, focus groups will be conducted with professionals who deliver the intervention. To analyze the trajectories, embedded and iterative integration will combine the qualitative findings with relevant quantitative data from the FASTRACS randomized controlled trial for 5 domains: personal situation, professional situation, RTW, care pathway, intervention tool use, and perceived usefulness. Results: The RECOVA-FASTRACS study received funding in 2022. Recruitment and qualitative data collection began in month 6. Final analyses are expected to be completed by the end of 2026, with dissemination of the main findings anticipated in late 2027. Conclusions: Our mixed methods realist evaluation will provide a detailed analysis of the intervention processes, helping to identify impact mechanisms within specific contexts. This approach is meant to ensure a more informed and realist deployment of the intervention by professionals following the study.

PubMedVol. 15
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Inserm (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Centre Léon Bérard (FR), Centre National des Soins Palliatifs et de la Fin de Vie (FR), Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (FR), Health Services and Performance Research Laboratory (FR), Suez (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.