Capturing regional variation in aortic mechanics: dual-estimation method for material parameter identification and biological correlation

Abstract The aorta shows significant regional variation in geometry and composition. This complexity makes numerical modeling challenging, as it requires identifying material parameters. Typically, the Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden model is used. However, it suffers from nonuniqueness and sensitivity to outliers, which can obscure biological variation. In addition, standard compressible formulations with a volumetric-isochoric split fail to couple volumetric and anisotropic responses. To address these issues, a regularized dual-estimation framework was introduced. This framework combines a global baseline estimator with local refinement while maintaining structural material continuity. Furthermore, it uses a Modified Anisotropic model to improve the representation of compressibility physics. For validation, the approach included uniaxial extension and protein quantification from Wistar rats. The results show that the proximal ascending/aortic-arch segment is most compliant at low stretch, whereas the abdominal aorta stiffens earlier and becomes fiber-dominated at lower stretch levels. Notably, these trends align directionally with regional composition. However, the fitted stress components are model-based descriptors rather than direct measurements of individual constituents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2025.1043
Primary Topic
Elasticity and Material Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Capturing regional variation in aortic mechanics: dual-estimation method for material parameter identification and biological correlation

Bruno Durante da Silva, Ricardo Doll Lahuerta, José Eduardo Krieger, Eduardo Moacyr Krieger et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Elasticity and Material Modeling
article

Capturing regional variation in aortic mechanics: dual-estimation method for material parameter identification and biological correlation

Bruno Durante da Silva, Ricardo Doll Lahuerta, José Eduardo Krieger, Eduardo Moacyr Krieger, Renato Crajoinas, Ayumi A. Miyakawa, Marina J. S. Maizato, Idagene A. Cestari
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aorta shows significant regional variation in geometry and composition. This complexity makes numerical modeling challenging, as it requires identifying material parameters. Typically, the Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden model is used. However, it suffers from nonuniqueness and sensitivity to outliers, which can obscure biological variation. In addition, standard compressible formulations with a volumetric-isochoric split fail to couple volumetric and anisotropic responses. To address these issues, a regularized dual-estimation framework was introduced. This framework combines a global baseline estimator with local refinement while maintaining structural material continuity. Furthermore, it uses a Modified Anisotropic model to improve the representation of compressibility physics. For validation, the approach included uniaxial extension and protein quantification from Wistar rats. The results show that the proximal ascending/aortic-arch segment is most compliant at low stretch, whereas the abdominal aorta stiffens earlier and becomes fiber-dominated at lower stretch levels. Notably, these trends align directionally with regional composition. However, the fitted stress components are model-based descriptors rather than direct measurements of individual constituents.

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 482(2345)
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Instituto do Coração (PT)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Elasticity and Material Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.