Sample Size Determination for Response‐Adaptive Randomization With Recurrent Event Responses and Unequal Follow‐Up Time

Trials with recurrent event responses are frequently encountered during clinical trials. Benefits have been demonstrated in previous studies when trials were conducted with a doubly biased coin design (DBCD). However, there is a lack of discussion about sample size determination. In this paper, we provide the methods to compute the required sample size with a given test power when DBCD is used. More importantly, our proposed sample size determination procedure also allows unequal follow-up time due mainly to possible patient dropout. Without considering patient dropout, it is shown that the required sample size to reach the prespecified test power is underestimated. Theoretical results are derived to measure the impact of dropouts on the required sample size and treatment allocation proportions. A simulation study is conducted to illustrate the usefulness of our proposed procedure. Finally, a clinical example is used to illustrate the advantages of our proposed procedure in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70611
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sample Size Determination for Response‐Adaptive Randomization With Recurrent Event Responses and Unequal Follow‐Up Time

Jingya Gao, Junjiang Zhong, Siu Hung Cheung, Xianggao Hu
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Sample Size Determination for Response‐Adaptive Randomization With Recurrent Event Responses and Unequal Follow‐Up Time

Jingya Gao, Junjiang Zhong, Siu Hung Cheung, Xianggao Hu
article en

Abstract

Trials with recurrent event responses are frequently encountered during clinical trials. Benefits have been demonstrated in previous studies when trials were conducted with a doubly biased coin design (DBCD). However, there is a lack of discussion about sample size determination. In this paper, we provide the methods to compute the required sample size with a given test power when DBCD is used. More importantly, our proposed sample size determination procedure also allows unequal follow-up time due mainly to possible patient dropout. Without considering patient dropout, it is shown that the required sample size to reach the prespecified test power is underestimated. Theoretical results are derived to measure the impact of dropouts on the required sample size and treatment allocation proportions. A simulation study is conducted to illustrate the usefulness of our proposed procedure. Finally, a clinical example is used to illustrate the advantages of our proposed procedure in practice.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 45(13-14)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Xiamen University of Technology (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sample Size Determination for Response‐Adaptive Randomization With Recurrent Event Responses and Unequal Follow‐Up Time — Jingya Gao, Junjiang Zhong, et al. · Statistics in Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS