Adversarial-Test-Driven Multi-Agent LLM Defense: A Self-Evolving Framework via Inference-Time Prompt Optimization

Large Language Models (LLMs) remain highly susceptible to jailbreak attacks that bypass safety alignments through sophisticated prompt manipulation. While multi-agent defense systems have emerged as a promising countermeasure, existing frameworks predominantly rely on static agent designs, which struggle to adapt to evolving adversarial strategies. To bridge this gap, we propose an Adversarial-Test-Driven Multi-Agent Defense framework that shifts the focus from model-level fine-tuning to system-level optimization. Our framework introduces a closed-loop evolutionary process consisting of an Attack Design agent that probes vulnerabilities with adaptive adversarial prompts, and an Optimization agent that iteratively refines the defense agents’ system prompts based on feedback. This approach enables the defense system to correct reasoning failures at inference time without requiring gradient-based updates to the underlying LLMs. The experimental results demonstrate that our framework achieves a state-of-the-art Attack Success Rate (ASR). The experiments show that the framework improves jailbreak robustness while making the associated safety–utility trade-off explicit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15112365
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adversarial-Test-Driven Multi-Agent LLM Defense: A Self-Evolving Framework via Inference-Time Prompt Optimization

Lei Cao, Hongxi Chen, Yi-Xiang Wang, Yang Qu et al.
Electronics
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Adversarial-Test-Driven Multi-Agent LLM Defense: A Self-Evolving Framework via Inference-Time Prompt Optimization

Lei Cao, Hongxi Chen, Yi-Xiang Wang, Yang Qu, Yuwei He, Sulei Li
article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) remain highly susceptible to jailbreak attacks that bypass safety alignments through sophisticated prompt manipulation. While multi-agent defense systems have emerged as a promising countermeasure, existing frameworks predominantly rely on static agent designs, which struggle to adapt to evolving adversarial strategies. To bridge this gap, we propose an Adversarial-Test-Driven Multi-Agent Defense framework that shifts the focus from model-level fine-tuning to system-level optimization. Our framework introduces a closed-loop evolutionary process consisting of an Attack Design agent that probes vulnerabilities with adaptive adversarial prompts, and an Optimization agent that iteratively refines the defense agents’ system prompts based on feedback. This approach enables the defense system to correct reasoning failures at inference time without requiring gradient-based updates to the underlying LLMs. The experimental results demonstrate that our framework achieves a state-of-the-art Attack Success Rate (ASR). The experiments show that the framework improves jailbreak robustness while making the associated safety–utility trade-off explicit.

ElectronicsVol. 15(11)
Institute of Computing Technology (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adversarial-Test-Driven Multi-Agent LLM Defense: A Self-Evolving Framework via Inference-Time Prompt Optimization — Lei Cao, Hongxi Chen, et al. · Electronics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS