A unified definition of data trusts: roles, comparative positioning, and typology

Abstract In the evolving digital economy, the challenge of sharing data while ensuring data sovereignty has become increasingly critical. Data trusts have been proposed as a governance model built around independent, fiduciary stewardship of data exchange between providers and consumers. Despite the concept’s potential, research in this domain remains nascent and fragmented across disciplines. Through a structured, topic-centered literature review, we address three research questions on the conceptualization of data trusts, the roles within the ecosystem, and outstanding research gaps. Our key contributions are threefold. First, we conceptualize data trusts through a consolidated definition, position them among adjacent data intermediaries, and derive a typology of four archetypes along primary objective and locus of governance authority. Second, we consolidate the fragmented role vocabulary into a minimal five-role model. Third, we propose a theory-informed research agenda that identifies nine gap categories and outlines directions for future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems and e-Business Management
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-026-00732-x
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A unified definition of data trusts: roles, comparative positioning, and typology

Maria A. Wimmer, Sankalp Biyani, Timon T. Aldenhoff, David Acev et al.
Information Systems and e-Business Management
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

A unified definition of data trusts: roles, comparative positioning, and typology

Maria A. Wimmer, Sankalp Biyani, Timon T. Aldenhoff, David Acev, Florian Rieder, Dennis M. Riehle
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the evolving digital economy, the challenge of sharing data while ensuring data sovereignty has become increasingly critical. Data trusts have been proposed as a governance model built around independent, fiduciary stewardship of data exchange between providers and consumers. Despite the concept’s potential, research in this domain remains nascent and fragmented across disciplines. Through a structured, topic-centered literature review, we address three research questions on the conceptualization of data trusts, the roles within the ecosystem, and outstanding research gaps. Our key contributions are threefold. First, we conceptualize data trusts through a consolidated definition, position them among adjacent data intermediaries, and derive a typology of four archetypes along primary objective and locus of governance authority. Second, we consolidate the fragmented role vocabulary into a minimal five-role model. Third, we propose a theory-informed research agenda that identifies nine gap categories and outlines directions for future work.

Information Systems and e-Business Management
Koblenz University of Applied Sciences (DE), Universität Koblenz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A unified definition of data trusts: roles, comparative positioning, and typology — Maria A. Wimmer, Sankalp Biyani, et al. · Information Systems and e-Business Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS