Some culture is hiding in plain sight in research on child development

Child development is cultural in nature, yet a divide persists between a (cross-)cultural developmental science niche alongside a seemingly a cultural mainstream. In particular, childhood research relying on convenience sampling in often Western, post-industrial (i.e., WEIRD) societies rarely ventures into issues of culture and context, promoting excessive overgeneralization and false assumptions of what is considered 'typical' in child development. This article has two aims: First, it illustrates the cultural make-up of the communities traditionally overrepresented yet often unmarked in developmental science, while highlighting important variations within this cluster. Second, it demonstrates how this cultural make-up, in turn, is key to the methods employed, the findings produced and the theories postulated in developmental science. Regardless of where it is conducted, developmental science is a cultural endeavour and thus needs to grapple with its cultural foundations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.70053
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Some culture is hiding in plain sight in research on child development

Roman Stengelin
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

Some culture is hiding in plain sight in research on child development

Roman Stengelin
article en

Abstract

Child development is cultural in nature, yet a divide persists between a (cross-)cultural developmental science niche alongside a seemingly a cultural mainstream. In particular, childhood research relying on convenience sampling in often Western, post-industrial (i.e., WEIRD) societies rarely ventures into issues of culture and context, promoting excessive overgeneralization and false assumptions of what is considered 'typical' in child development. This article has two aims: First, it illustrates the cultural make-up of the communities traditionally overrepresented yet often unmarked in developmental science, while highlighting important variations within this cluster. Second, it demonstrates how this cultural make-up, in turn, is key to the methods employed, the findings produced and the theories postulated in developmental science. Regardless of where it is conducted, developmental science is a cultural endeavour and thus needs to grapple with its cultural foundations.

British Journal of Developmental Psychology
University of Namibia (NA), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Some culture is hiding in plain sight in research on child development — Roman Stengelin · British Journal of Developmental Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS