Comparative evaluation of cold plasma and microwave treatments for postharvest insect control and quality preservation in cereal grains

BACKGROUND: Postharvest cereal protection requires residue-free technologies that suppress stored-grain insects while preserving grain quality. This study directly compared atmospheric-pressure cold plasma (CP) and microwave (MW) treatments to determine which physical approach provides the more practical balance between pest control and quality retention. RESULTS: Evaluation was conducted from two complementary aspects: pest control and grain quality. Cereal grains were treated with CP at 10-20 kV or MW at 300-900 W. For pest control, both technologies produced significant intensity-dependent increases in adult mortality and reductions in grain weight loss caused by insect feeding and F₁ progeny emergence relative to untreated controls (P ≤ 0.05). CP achieved strong insect suppression at moderate voltages, whereas MW also provided effective control, particularly as power increased. For grain quality, protein and starch contents showed limited variation (< 3-4%), while enzyme activities and starch gelatinization enthalpy were more strongly affected by high-power MW than by CP. Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity increased at intermediate treatment intensities, indicating treatment-related modification of bioactive components. CONCLUSION: CP and MW are effective non-chemical disinfestation technologies, but they differ in their quality-related trade-offs. Under the tested conditions, CP offered the more favorable balance by suppressing insects while causing comparatively fewer biochemical and thermal changes, whereas MW requires careful optimization to avoid excessive quality deterioration. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pest Management Science
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.70978
Primary Topic
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of cold plasma and microwave treatments for postharvest insect control and quality preservation in cereal grains

A. L. S. Hashem, Laila A. Al‐Shuraym, Fatma Khalıl, Ahmed AA Aioub et al.
Pest Management Science
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
article

Comparative evaluation of cold plasma and microwave treatments for postharvest insect control and quality preservation in cereal grains

A. L. S. Hashem, Laila A. Al‐Shuraym, Fatma Khalıl, Ahmed AA Aioub, Wael H Elmenofy, Sherif M El‐Ganainy, Mustafa Shukry, Hosny H Kesba
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postharvest cereal protection requires residue-free technologies that suppress stored-grain insects while preserving grain quality. This study directly compared atmospheric-pressure cold plasma (CP) and microwave (MW) treatments to determine which physical approach provides the more practical balance between pest control and quality retention. RESULTS: Evaluation was conducted from two complementary aspects: pest control and grain quality. Cereal grains were treated with CP at 10-20 kV or MW at 300-900 W. For pest control, both technologies produced significant intensity-dependent increases in adult mortality and reductions in grain weight loss caused by insect feeding and F₁ progeny emergence relative to untreated controls (P ≤ 0.05). CP achieved strong insect suppression at moderate voltages, whereas MW also provided effective control, particularly as power increased. For grain quality, protein and starch contents showed limited variation (< 3-4%), while enzyme activities and starch gelatinization enthalpy were more strongly affected by high-power MW than by CP. Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity increased at intermediate treatment intensities, indicating treatment-related modification of bioactive components. CONCLUSION: CP and MW are effective non-chemical disinfestation technologies, but they differ in their quality-related trade-offs. Under the tested conditions, CP offered the more favorable balance by suppressing insects while causing comparatively fewer biochemical and thermal changes, whereas MW requires careful optimization to avoid excessive quality deterioration. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

Pest Management Science
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Kafrelsheikh University (EG), Zagazig University (EG), Agricultural Research Center (EG), King Faisal University (SA), King Khalid University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.