Reassessing the organic carbon budget in the Murchison meteorite through an extraction–recovery mass‐balance approach

Abstract A substantial fraction of organic carbon in carbonaceous chondrites has long been described as “missing,” reflecting incomplete recovery and limited resolution of operationally defined organic components. Here, we present a quantitative reassessment of the carbon budget in the Murchison meteorite using an integrated extraction–recovery mass‐balance approach that constrains the distribution of carbon among operational fractions. Insoluble organic matter accounts for 69% ± 1.4% of total carbon, while acid‐hydrolyzable organic matter (AOM) constitutes 15% ± 2.9%, representing a carbon pool comparable to soluble organic matter (SOM, 14% ± 2.7%). Carbonate‐derived carbon accounts for 2% ± 2.0% of the total carbon inventory. The total recovered organic carbon reaches 88% ± 1.4% of bulk carbon. Carbon previously regarded as “missing” can be quantitatively reassigned to specific organic fractions, including uncollected AOM (7%) and SOM (2%), substantially reducing the previously unconstrained carbon fraction. Replicate analyses of three independently processed subsamples yield consistent residue‐based carbon partitioning, supporting the robustness of the mass‐balance framework. These results indicate that much of the missing carbon reflects incomplete recovery in analytical workflows rather than an unidentified reservoir, refining the organic carbon inventory of Murchison and providing a framework for reassessing carbon partitioning in primitive planetary materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.70173
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassessing the organic carbon budget in the Murchison meteorite through an extraction–recovery mass‐balance approach

Koichi Mimura, Hina DOHI, Minako Hashiguchi
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Astro and Planetary Science
article

Reassessing the organic carbon budget in the Murchison meteorite through an extraction–recovery mass‐balance approach

Koichi Mimura, Hina DOHI, Minako Hashiguchi
article en

Abstract

Abstract A substantial fraction of organic carbon in carbonaceous chondrites has long been described as “missing,” reflecting incomplete recovery and limited resolution of operationally defined organic components. Here, we present a quantitative reassessment of the carbon budget in the Murchison meteorite using an integrated extraction–recovery mass‐balance approach that constrains the distribution of carbon among operational fractions. Insoluble organic matter accounts for 69% ± 1.4% of total carbon, while acid‐hydrolyzable organic matter (AOM) constitutes 15% ± 2.9%, representing a carbon pool comparable to soluble organic matter (SOM, 14% ± 2.7%). Carbonate‐derived carbon accounts for 2% ± 2.0% of the total carbon inventory. The total recovered organic carbon reaches 88% ± 1.4% of bulk carbon. Carbon previously regarded as “missing” can be quantitatively reassigned to specific organic fractions, including uncollected AOM (7%) and SOM (2%), substantially reducing the previously unconstrained carbon fraction. Replicate analyses of three independently processed subsamples yield consistent residue‐based carbon partitioning, supporting the robustness of the mass‐balance framework. These results indicate that much of the missing carbon reflects incomplete recovery in analytical workflows rather than an unidentified reservoir, refining the organic carbon inventory of Murchison and providing a framework for reassessing carbon partitioning in primitive planetary materials.

Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Nagoya University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.