Online psychoeducation and assessment for borderline personality disorder as a first step of care: A pilot study assessing safety, feasibility, and mechanisms of change

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for borderline personality disorder (BPD) recommend assessment, diagnosis, and psychoeducation. We report on the feasibility and safety of a randomized controlled trial protocol of online psychoeducation, assessment, and personalized feedback as an immediate first step of care for BPD. METHODS: Newly diagnosed participants were randomized to receive 10 videos about BPD or general mental health for two weeks. Half the participants receiving BPD videos were randomized to receive personalized feedback on changes in symptom ratings and cognitive performance. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) evaluated interpersonal interactions, emotions, and behaviors for 30 days. BPD symptoms, depression, and personality functioning were assessed at baseline, after videos, after feedback, and one month later. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants were randomized into three conditions that did not differ significantly in terms of demographics or baseline variables. Dropout occurred for 32.9% of the sample. No differences in rate of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or other escalations in level of care were reported among groups. Satisfaction was higher for those receiving psychoeducational videos about BPD. Improvement in BPD knowledge in the psychoeducation conditions was significantly greater than the control condition. No statistically significant differences were found regarding reduction of BPD symptoms. The psychoeducation with feedback arm showed significantly greater improvements in self-impairment compared to controls with medium effect size at the final time-point. Modeling of the relationship between time spent alone and BPD symptoms showed a positive correlation in the control condition, but in the group receiving both psychoeducation about BPD and feedback, this relationship was negative. CONCLUSION: Online psychoeducational videos and assessment were safe, feasible, and acceptable to participants with newly diagnosed BPD. Psychoeducation with personalized feedback appears to be more effective than either BPD or general psychoeducation alone in improving deficits in self-functioning, which may relate to an increased capacity to be alone with fewer symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05358925.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353836
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online psychoeducation and assessment for borderline personality disorder as a first step of care: A pilot study assessing safety, feasibility, and mechanisms of change

Grace E. Murray, Sara R. Masland, Destiny Crisp, Margaret Mosby et al.
PLoS ONE
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Online psychoeducation and assessment for borderline personality disorder as a first step of care: A pilot study assessing safety, feasibility, and mechanisms of change

Grace E. Murray, Sara R. Masland, Destiny Crisp, Margaret Mosby, Loïs Choi-Kain, Sam Mermin, Boyu Ren, Laura Germine, Julia B Jurist
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for borderline personality disorder (BPD) recommend assessment, diagnosis, and psychoeducation. We report on the feasibility and safety of a randomized controlled trial protocol of online psychoeducation, assessment, and personalized feedback as an immediate first step of care for BPD. METHODS: Newly diagnosed participants were randomized to receive 10 videos about BPD or general mental health for two weeks. Half the participants receiving BPD videos were randomized to receive personalized feedback on changes in symptom ratings and cognitive performance. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) evaluated interpersonal interactions, emotions, and behaviors for 30 days. BPD symptoms, depression, and personality functioning were assessed at baseline, after videos, after feedback, and one month later. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants were randomized into three conditions that did not differ significantly in terms of demographics or baseline variables. Dropout occurred for 32.9% of the sample. No differences in rate of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or other escalations in level of care were reported among groups. Satisfaction was higher for those receiving psychoeducational videos about BPD. Improvement in BPD knowledge in the psychoeducation conditions was significantly greater than the control condition. No statistically significant differences were found regarding reduction of BPD symptoms. The psychoeducation with feedback arm showed significantly greater improvements in self-impairment compared to controls with medium effect size at the final time-point. Modeling of the relationship between time spent alone and BPD symptoms showed a positive correlation in the control condition, but in the group receiving both psychoeducation about BPD and feedback, this relationship was negative. CONCLUSION: Online psychoeducational videos and assessment were safe, feasible, and acceptable to participants with newly diagnosed BPD. Psychoeducation with personalized feedback appears to be more effective than either BPD or general psychoeducation alone in improving deficits in self-functioning, which may relate to an increased capacity to be alone with fewer symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05358925.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
Boston University (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Harvard University (US), Long Island University (US), Fordham University (US), Pomona College (US), McLean Hospital (US)
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, McLean Contributionship
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.