Evaluation at a Democratic Inflection Point: Global Institutional Shifts, USAID's 2025 Reckoning, and Lessons for U.S. Evaluation Practice

ABSTRACT Evaluation is a foundational element of democratic governance and U.S. government global leadership, yet its role is increasingly contested as institutions experience political centralization, weakened capacity, and shifting global influence. This article argues that evaluation must continue being understood as democratic and transparent infrastructure whose erosion may further reshape OECD‐focused accountability, public value, and collective decision‐making and standard setting. Framed by the normative guidance of OECD and USAID transparency frameworks, and drawing on the 2023 USAID/RFS Global Leadership Evaluation alongside analyses of philanthropic expansion, the article fast‐forward to the 2025 USAID closure. Using examples from Kenya and Zimbabwe, it highlights how bilateral shifts are redefining partnership models with implications for evaluation practices. It concludes with lessons for U.S. evaluators navigating a world where public evidence systems are fragile, private actors shape epistemic authority, and democratic accountability requires rebuilding independent evaluative capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Evaluation
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.70030
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation at a Democratic Inflection Point: Global Institutional Shifts, USAID's 2025 Reckoning, and Lessons for U.S. Evaluation Practice

Svetlana Negroustoueva, Cynthia Clapp Wincek
New Directions for Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Evaluation at a Democratic Inflection Point: Global Institutional Shifts, USAID's 2025 Reckoning, and Lessons for U.S. Evaluation Practice

Svetlana Negroustoueva, Cynthia Clapp Wincek
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Evaluation is a foundational element of democratic governance and U.S. government global leadership, yet its role is increasingly contested as institutions experience political centralization, weakened capacity, and shifting global influence. This article argues that evaluation must continue being understood as democratic and transparent infrastructure whose erosion may further reshape OECD‐focused accountability, public value, and collective decision‐making and standard setting. Framed by the normative guidance of OECD and USAID transparency frameworks, and drawing on the 2023 USAID/RFS Global Leadership Evaluation alongside analyses of philanthropic expansion, the article fast‐forward to the 2025 USAID closure. Using examples from Kenya and Zimbabwe, it highlights how bilateral shifts are redefining partnership models with implications for evaluation practices. It concludes with lessons for U.S. evaluators navigating a world where public evidence systems are fragile, private actors shape epistemic authority, and democratic accountability requires rebuilding independent evaluative capacity.

New Directions for Evaluation
CGIAR (FR), Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.