Oribatid mites like lichens—feeding preferences among three Cladonia species with different chemistry

Abstract Lichens in general and members of the genus Cladonia in particular are known for their repertoire of chemical substances. These substances have been attributed various roles, including a role in the defence against herbivores. Unsurprisingly, Cladonia species share habitats with many small invertebrates, like mites. Mites have been suggested to regularly feed on lichens, with potential detrimental effects for the lichen. Here we tested the feeding preferences of two oribatid mite species ( Carabodes areolatus and C. marginatus ) for three members of the lichen genus Cladonia . Cladonia coniocraea , C . norvegica and C . rubrotincta have similar morphology, ecology, and they regularly share their habitats with the selected mites, but produce different chemical compounds (barbatic acid in Cladonia norvegica , barbatic and rhodocladonic acids in Cladonia rubrotincta , and the fumarprotocetraric acid complex in Cladonia coniocraea ), some of which are considered to have antiherbivore properties. Our experiments conducted over a period of 14 days revealed that none of the three lichens was rejected as a food source. When given a choice between two different lichens, mites prefer C. rubrotincta over C. norvegica , but feed to a similar extent on C. coniocraea and C. rubrotincta . In experiments only with C. rubrotincta , which produces the red chemical compound rhodocladonic acid, a substance with suggested antiherbivore activity, mites surprisingly seem to prefer red-pigmented over unpigmented tissue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-54891-5
Primary Topic
Study of Mite Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oribatid mites like lichens—feeding preferences among three Cladonia species with different chemistry

Philipp Resl, Tobias Pfingstl, Jan Mourek, Jana Steinová et al.
Scientific Reports
Study of Mite Species
article

Oribatid mites like lichens—feeding preferences among three Cladonia species with different chemistry

Philipp Resl, Tobias Pfingstl, Jan Mourek, Jana Steinová, Věra Vtípilová, Heda Ghlimová
article en

Abstract

Abstract Lichens in general and members of the genus Cladonia in particular are known for their repertoire of chemical substances. These substances have been attributed various roles, including a role in the defence against herbivores. Unsurprisingly, Cladonia species share habitats with many small invertebrates, like mites. Mites have been suggested to regularly feed on lichens, with potential detrimental effects for the lichen. Here we tested the feeding preferences of two oribatid mite species ( Carabodes areolatus and C. marginatus ) for three members of the lichen genus Cladonia . Cladonia coniocraea , C . norvegica and C . rubrotincta have similar morphology, ecology, and they regularly share their habitats with the selected mites, but produce different chemical compounds (barbatic acid in Cladonia norvegica , barbatic and rhodocladonic acids in Cladonia rubrotincta , and the fumarprotocetraric acid complex in Cladonia coniocraea ), some of which are considered to have antiherbivore properties. Our experiments conducted over a period of 14 days revealed that none of the three lichens was rejected as a food source. When given a choice between two different lichens, mites prefer C. rubrotincta over C. norvegica , but feed to a similar extent on C. coniocraea and C. rubrotincta . In experiments only with C. rubrotincta , which produces the red chemical compound rhodocladonic acid, a substance with suggested antiherbivore activity, mites surprisingly seem to prefer red-pigmented over unpigmented tissue.

Scientific Reports
University of Graz (AT), Charles University (CZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Study of Mite Species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.