Self-relevance dominates memory, whereas partner-relevance depends on retrieval goals: evidence from event-related potentials.

Self-related information consistently receives privileged processing, a phenomenon known as the self-prioritization effect (SPE). In contrast, the joint memory effect (JME) refers to enhanced memory for information associated with a task partner. This study investigated temporal and functional dynamics of these effects during encoding and retrieval using event-related potentials (ERPs). In Experiment 1, participants performed an incidental encoding task followed by intentional retrieval. In Experiment 2, the same encoding task was followed by incidental retrieval. In the encoding task, participants judged whether each word belonged to the self-category. In the intentional retrieval task, they made old/new judgments for previously presented words, whereas in the incidental retrieval task, they counted target words. During encoding, self-related words elicited reduced N400 amplitudes, increased P3b amplitudes, and shorter P3b latencies, indicating greater expectancy, stronger attentional allocation, and faster evaluation. During retrieval, late positive components (LPCs) revealed robust SPEs under both intentional and incidental conditions, whereas the JME emerged only during intentional retrieval. These findings show that self-relevance exerts a pervasive influence on memory, independent of retrieval goals, whereas partner-related information depends more on task context. The results clarify how social labels modulate encoding and retrieval, highlighting the robustness of self-related prioritization and the conditional nature of joint memory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2026.104074
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-relevance dominates memory, whereas partner-relevance depends on retrieval goals: evidence from event-related potentials.

Kazuhito Yoshizaki, Kimiko Kato
PubMed
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Self-relevance dominates memory, whereas partner-relevance depends on retrieval goals: evidence from event-related potentials.

Kazuhito Yoshizaki, Kimiko Kato
article en

Abstract

Self-related information consistently receives privileged processing, a phenomenon known as the self-prioritization effect (SPE). In contrast, the joint memory effect (JME) refers to enhanced memory for information associated with a task partner. This study investigated temporal and functional dynamics of these effects during encoding and retrieval using event-related potentials (ERPs). In Experiment 1, participants performed an incidental encoding task followed by intentional retrieval. In Experiment 2, the same encoding task was followed by incidental retrieval. In the encoding task, participants judged whether each word belonged to the self-category. In the intentional retrieval task, they made old/new judgments for previously presented words, whereas in the incidental retrieval task, they counted target words. During encoding, self-related words elicited reduced N400 amplitudes, increased P3b amplitudes, and shorter P3b latencies, indicating greater expectancy, stronger attentional allocation, and faster evaluation. During retrieval, late positive components (LPCs) revealed robust SPEs under both intentional and incidental conditions, whereas the JME emerged only during intentional retrieval. These findings show that self-relevance exerts a pervasive influence on memory, independent of retrieval goals, whereas partner-related information depends more on task context. The results clarify how social labels modulate encoding and retrieval, highlighting the robustness of self-related prioritization and the conditional nature of joint memory.

PubMedVol. 142
Aichi Shukutoku University (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.