Predictive value of Slug-positive circulating tumor cells for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in mesenchymal malignancies

To evaluate the predictive value of Slug-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in mesenchymal malignancies. Prospective observational analysis of 59 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Peripheral blood was collected pre-treatment for CTC classification. Chemotherapy response was defined as complete response or partial response. Logistic regression identified factors associated with poor response. A combined model integrating Slug+ epithelial CTCs (ECTCs) and Slug+ mesenchymal CTCs (MCTCs) was developed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed predictive performance; Cox regression evaluated long-term outcomes. Responders had lower Slug+ MCTCs (2.12 ± 1.84 vs. 3.85 ± 2.25) and higher Slug+ ECTCs. The combined model showed superior predictive ability (AUC = 0.873) versus single CTC subtypes. Patients with predicted probability > 0.62 were responders. Cox analysis indicated the model predicted long-term prognosis when Slug+ MCTCs and Slug+ ECTCs were not simultaneously zero. Phenotypic heterogeneity influences neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. High Slug+ MCTCs and low Slug+ ECTCs indicate insensitivity. The combined model showed promising performance for identifying treatment response and potential prognostic relevance in this prospective cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-026-06516-7
Primary Topic
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive value of Slug-positive circulating tumor cells for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in mesenchymal malignancies

冯俊伟, Baoxiu Xu, Niezhenghao He, Haowen Cui et al.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
article

Predictive value of Slug-positive circulating tumor cells for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in mesenchymal malignancies

冯俊伟, Baoxiu Xu, Niezhenghao He, Haowen Cui, Qingxin Fan, Weimin Liang, Peng Hao, Shilei Liu, Bao Yao, Fusha Amu
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the predictive value of Slug-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in mesenchymal malignancies. Prospective observational analysis of 59 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Peripheral blood was collected pre-treatment for CTC classification. Chemotherapy response was defined as complete response or partial response. Logistic regression identified factors associated with poor response. A combined model integrating Slug+ epithelial CTCs (ECTCs) and Slug+ mesenchymal CTCs (MCTCs) was developed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed predictive performance; Cox regression evaluated long-term outcomes. Responders had lower Slug+ MCTCs (2.12 ± 1.84 vs. 3.85 ± 2.25) and higher Slug+ ECTCs. The combined model showed superior predictive ability (AUC = 0.873) versus single CTC subtypes. Patients with predicted probability > 0.62 were responders. Cox analysis indicated the model predicted long-term prognosis when Slug+ MCTCs and Slug+ ECTCs were not simultaneously zero. Phenotypic heterogeneity influences neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. High Slug+ MCTCs and low Slug+ ECTCs indicate insensitivity. The combined model showed promising performance for identifying treatment response and potential prognostic relevance in this prospective cohort.

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Integrated Chinese Medicine (China) (HK)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.