High-Risk Comorbidities Drive Adverse Inpatient Outcomes After ERCP: A National Analysis and Predictive Model

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients undergoing ERCP with chronic kidney disease (CKD), congestive heart failure (CHF), or liver cirrhosis (LC) often experience worse outcomes. It is unclear whether these are driven by procedure-related events or underlying comorbidity. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample to identify adult ERCP cases. High-risk comorbidities were defined as CKD, CHF, or LC. Primary outcomes were inpatient mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Among 1,171,973 ERCP admissions, 267,739 (22.8%) were high-risk. Compared with lower-risk patients, high-risk patients had higher inpatient mortality (3.8% vs 0.8%, P < 0.001) and morbidity (71.8% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001). They also had longer LOS (8.5 vs 5.3 days, P < 0.001) and higher charges ($122,635 vs $81,984, P < 0.001). In adjusted models, high-risk comorbidities independently predicted mortality (OR 3.80, 95% CI 3.66-3.94) and morbidity (OR 3.22, 95% CI 3.18-3.26). LC was the strongest predictor of mortality (OR 4.53), while CHF was most associated with morbidity (OR 2.84). Predictive models showed good discrimination (AUC 0.76 for mortality; 0.73 for morbidity). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk comorbidities are present in nearly one-quarter of ERCP admissions and strongly predict worse inpatient outcomes. Most adverse events are likely driven by underlying illness rather than ERCP-specific complications. Our validated predictive models may inform counseling, triage, and peri-procedural management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-026-10026-4
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Risk Comorbidities Drive Adverse Inpatient Outcomes After ERCP: A National Analysis and Predictive Model

Stuart K. Amateau, Zachary Leslie, Ahmed Dirweesh, Yasmin Ali et al.
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

High-Risk Comorbidities Drive Adverse Inpatient Outcomes After ERCP: A National Analysis and Predictive Model

Stuart K. Amateau, Zachary Leslie, Ahmed Dirweesh, Yasmin Ali, Khalid Ahmed, Eric S. Wise, Nabeel Azeem, Martin Freeman
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients undergoing ERCP with chronic kidney disease (CKD), congestive heart failure (CHF), or liver cirrhosis (LC) often experience worse outcomes. It is unclear whether these are driven by procedure-related events or underlying comorbidity. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample to identify adult ERCP cases. High-risk comorbidities were defined as CKD, CHF, or LC. Primary outcomes were inpatient mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Among 1,171,973 ERCP admissions, 267,739 (22.8%) were high-risk. Compared with lower-risk patients, high-risk patients had higher inpatient mortality (3.8% vs 0.8%, P < 0.001) and morbidity (71.8% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001). They also had longer LOS (8.5 vs 5.3 days, P < 0.001) and higher charges ($122,635 vs $81,984, P < 0.001). In adjusted models, high-risk comorbidities independently predicted mortality (OR 3.80, 95% CI 3.66-3.94) and morbidity (OR 3.22, 95% CI 3.18-3.26). LC was the strongest predictor of mortality (OR 4.53), while CHF was most associated with morbidity (OR 2.84). Predictive models showed good discrimination (AUC 0.76 for mortality; 0.73 for morbidity). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk comorbidities are present in nearly one-quarter of ERCP admissions and strongly predict worse inpatient outcomes. Most adverse events are likely driven by underlying illness rather than ERCP-specific complications. Our validated predictive models may inform counseling, triage, and peri-procedural management.

Digestive Diseases and Sciences
University of Minnesota (US), Carleton College (US), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.