Clinical evaluation of a new fully automated biometer integrating optical low-coherence reflectometry and Placido-disk topography

Abstract Background To investigate the precision (intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility) of the AL550, an automated biometer that integrates optical low-coherence reflectometry with Placido-disk topography, and to assess the inter-device agreement with the IOLMaster 700. Methods This prospective study enrolled 112 healthy participants. Each participant underwent three consecutive right-eye measurements by two operators with different levels of experience using the AL550 to assess intraobserver and interobserver variability. Additionally, three measurements were obtained by a skilled operator using the IOLMaster 700 for inter-device comparison. The parameters assessed included axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), flattest, steepest, and mean keratometry (Kf, Ks, and Km), astigmatism, and corneal diameter (CD). Measurement precision was analyzed using the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test–retest repeatability (TRT), coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Inter-device agreement was assessed using paired t -tests and Bland–Altman analysis. Results The AL550 demonstrated excellent repeatability and reproducibility across all parameters, with low Sw, TRT, and CoV values, and ICCs exceeding 0.939. Inter-device agreement with the IOLMaster 700 was excellent for most parameters, with narrow 95% limits of agreement (LoA) (AL: − 0.09 to 0.08 mm, CCT: − 16.55 to 5.46 μm, ACD: − 0.04 to 0.18 mm, LT: − 0.27 to 0.07 mm, Km: − 0.26 to 0.26 D). However, CD exhibited a wider 95% LoA (− 0.82 to − 0.15 mm). Conclusion The AL550 provides highly repeatable and reproducible biometric measurements with minimal operator dependence. Inter-device agreement with the IOLMaster 700 was excellent for all parameters except CD, suggesting that the two devices may be used interchangeably in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eye and Vision
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-026-00492-2
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical evaluation of a new fully automated biometer integrating optical low-coherence reflectometry and Placido-disk topography

Chak Seng Lei, Giacomo Savini, Yihong Chen, Bowen Tan et al.
Eye and Vision
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Clinical evaluation of a new fully automated biometer integrating optical low-coherence reflectometry and Placido-disk topography

Chak Seng Lei, Giacomo Savini, Yihong Chen, Bowen Tan, Xinning Yang, X Y Zhou, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Jinhai Huang, Zheng Li, Kexin Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To investigate the precision (intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility) of the AL550, an automated biometer that integrates optical low-coherence reflectometry with Placido-disk topography, and to assess the inter-device agreement with the IOLMaster 700. Methods This prospective study enrolled 112 healthy participants. Each participant underwent three consecutive right-eye measurements by two operators with different levels of experience using the AL550 to assess intraobserver and interobserver variability. Additionally, three measurements were obtained by a skilled operator using the IOLMaster 700 for inter-device comparison. The parameters assessed included axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), flattest, steepest, and mean keratometry (Kf, Ks, and Km), astigmatism, and corneal diameter (CD). Measurement precision was analyzed using the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test–retest repeatability (TRT), coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Inter-device agreement was assessed using paired t -tests and Bland–Altman analysis. Results The AL550 demonstrated excellent repeatability and reproducibility across all parameters, with low Sw, TRT, and CoV values, and ICCs exceeding 0.939. Inter-device agreement with the IOLMaster 700 was excellent for most parameters, with narrow 95% limits of agreement (LoA) (AL: − 0.09 to 0.08 mm, CCT: − 16.55 to 5.46 μm, ACD: − 0.04 to 0.18 mm, LT: − 0.27 to 0.07 mm, Km: − 0.26 to 0.26 D). However, CD exhibited a wider 95% LoA (− 0.82 to − 0.15 mm). Conclusion The AL550 provides highly repeatable and reproducible biometric measurements with minimal operator dependence. Inter-device agreement with the IOLMaster 700 was excellent for all parameters except CD, suggesting that the two devices may be used interchangeably in clinical practice.

Eye and VisionVol. 13(1)
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Affiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College (CN), Fondazione G.B. Bietti (IT), Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.