A comparative study on safety standards and certification systems for dental laboratory steam cleaners: focusing on 5 major jurisdictions

Purpose:This study aimed to comparatively analyze the regulatory frameworks, conformity-assessment pathways, and safety standard structures applicable to dental laboratory steam cleaners in five major jurisdictions-Korea, the European Union, the United States, Japan, and China-and to identify document-level gaps relevant to dental laboratory environments.Materials and Methods: Designed as a document-based comparative regulatory analysis, this study reviewed official laws, certification systems, international and national safety standards, and a reported domestic accident case.The analytical framework systematically evaluated regulatory pathways, standard linkages, and whether explicit clauses addressed critical safety issues specific to dental laboratory conditions.These included combined metallic dust exposure, humidity, close-range operation, and the hazards of repeated pressurization.Results: The reviewed documents revealed two broad regulatory structures.The EU, Japan, China, and Korea utilize legal frameworks directly linked to IEC 60335 or equivalent harmonized standards, whereas the US applies productspecific safety standards within the OSHA Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory system.Conformity assessments varied across regions, ranging from manufacturer self-declarations to mandatory third-party certifications.Notably, no explicit clauses specifically addressing repeated pressurization durability, combined dust-humidity exposure, or close-range operator protection in dental laboratories were identified in the reviewed standards.A 2023 steam-cleaner explosion in a Korean dental laboratory further highlighted these pressure-related workplace hazards.Conclusion: Although the frameworks structurally align with general electrical safety systems, application-specific provisions for dental laboratory steam cleaners remain limited.The findings strongly support the necessity for use-specific safety guidance, reinforced durability testing for pressure-related components, and clearer maintenance requirements.(

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2026.42.2.102
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study on safety standards and certification systems for dental laboratory steam cleaners: focusing on 5 major jurisdictions

Wook-Tae Kim
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

A comparative study on safety standards and certification systems for dental laboratory steam cleaners: focusing on 5 major jurisdictions

Wook-Tae Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose:This study aimed to comparatively analyze the regulatory frameworks, conformity-assessment pathways, and safety standard structures applicable to dental laboratory steam cleaners in five major jurisdictions-Korea, the European Union, the United States, Japan, and China-and to identify document-level gaps relevant to dental laboratory environments.Materials and Methods: Designed as a document-based comparative regulatory analysis, this study reviewed official laws, certification systems, international and national safety standards, and a reported domestic accident case.The analytical framework systematically evaluated regulatory pathways, standard linkages, and whether explicit clauses addressed critical safety issues specific to dental laboratory conditions.These included combined metallic dust exposure, humidity, close-range operation, and the hazards of repeated pressurization.Results: The reviewed documents revealed two broad regulatory structures.The EU, Japan, China, and Korea utilize legal frameworks directly linked to IEC 60335 or equivalent harmonized standards, whereas the US applies productspecific safety standards within the OSHA Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory system.Conformity assessments varied across regions, ranging from manufacturer self-declarations to mandatory third-party certifications.Notably, no explicit clauses specifically addressing repeated pressurization durability, combined dust-humidity exposure, or close-range operator protection in dental laboratories were identified in the reviewed standards.A 2023 steam-cleaner explosion in a Korean dental laboratory further highlighted these pressure-related workplace hazards.Conclusion: Although the frameworks structurally align with general electrical safety systems, application-specific provisions for dental laboratory steam cleaners remain limited.The findings strongly support the necessity for use-specific safety guidance, reinforced durability testing for pressure-related components, and clearer maintenance requirements.(

Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied ScienceVol. 42(2)
Shinhan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.