Hyperelastic modelling of candidate elastomers for an inflatable knee implant

Abstract As the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis continues to rise, there is an urgent clinical need for load‐bearing implants that can be arthroscopically delivered to restore joint function and delay major surgical intervention. This study addresses the core scientific challenges of material selection and mechanical characterisation for such implants, focusing on two candidate bioelastomers: polycarbonate urethane (PCU) (ChronoFlex C™ 80A) and silicone‐polycarbonate copolymer (Si‐PC) (ChronoSil® 93A). The novelty of this work lies in combining experimental hyperelastic material model generation for these candidate implant elastomers with a multiphysics computational assessment of a novel arthroscopically insertable inflatable knee implant for load‐bearing osteoarthritis treatment. Comprehensive mechanical testing, including uniaxial tension, compression, planar shear and volumetric compression, was performed to quantify the nonlinear elastic behaviour of the two materials. Multiple hyperelastic material models, namely neo‐Hookean, Mooney–Rivlin, Ogden, Ogden third order and polynomial third order, were fitted to the experimental data, and their accuracy was assessed through numerical modelling. For PCU, the neo‐Hookean and Mooney–Rivlin models exhibited the lowest mean absolute errors, while the Ogden model showed improved performance in the working strain range (−50% to 100%). For Si‐PC, only the neo‐Hookean model fell below 10% error. These validated material models were then incorporated into a multiphysics computational framework to simulate the mechanical behaviour of a novel inflatable knee implant under physiological load, demonstrating acceptable structural response and favourable stress profiles. The computational model included knee joint structures derived from magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans, hyperelastic material models, time‐dependent loading and fluid–structure interactions between the implant and fluid contained within it. The integration of rigorous experimental characterisation and advanced material modelling provides a robust foundation for the future computational optimisation and clinical implementation of soft knee implants. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer International
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.70153
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hyperelastic modelling of candidate elastomers for an inflatable knee implant

Pierluigi Mollicone, Arif Rochman, Pierre Schembri-Wismayer, Joseph Buhagiar et al.
Polymer International
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Hyperelastic modelling of candidate elastomers for an inflatable knee implant

Pierluigi Mollicone, Arif Rochman, Pierre Schembri-Wismayer, Joseph Buhagiar, Karl Galea Naudi Borg
article en

Abstract

Abstract As the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis continues to rise, there is an urgent clinical need for load‐bearing implants that can be arthroscopically delivered to restore joint function and delay major surgical intervention. This study addresses the core scientific challenges of material selection and mechanical characterisation for such implants, focusing on two candidate bioelastomers: polycarbonate urethane (PCU) (ChronoFlex C™ 80A) and silicone‐polycarbonate copolymer (Si‐PC) (ChronoSil® 93A). The novelty of this work lies in combining experimental hyperelastic material model generation for these candidate implant elastomers with a multiphysics computational assessment of a novel arthroscopically insertable inflatable knee implant for load‐bearing osteoarthritis treatment. Comprehensive mechanical testing, including uniaxial tension, compression, planar shear and volumetric compression, was performed to quantify the nonlinear elastic behaviour of the two materials. Multiple hyperelastic material models, namely neo‐Hookean, Mooney–Rivlin, Ogden, Ogden third order and polynomial third order, were fitted to the experimental data, and their accuracy was assessed through numerical modelling. For PCU, the neo‐Hookean and Mooney–Rivlin models exhibited the lowest mean absolute errors, while the Ogden model showed improved performance in the working strain range (−50% to 100%). For Si‐PC, only the neo‐Hookean model fell below 10% error. These validated material models were then incorporated into a multiphysics computational framework to simulate the mechanical behaviour of a novel inflatable knee implant under physiological load, demonstrating acceptable structural response and favourable stress profiles. The computational model included knee joint structures derived from magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans, hyperelastic material models, time‐dependent loading and fluid–structure interactions between the implant and fluid contained within it. The integration of rigorous experimental characterisation and advanced material modelling provides a robust foundation for the future computational optimisation and clinical implementation of soft knee implants. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

Polymer International
University of Malta (MT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.