Superiority of MLR Over NLR and PLR In Predicting Advanced Stage Disease In Treatment-Naive Serous Ovarian Cancer

Purpose: The prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers in ovarian cancer is contradictory. This study aimed to compare the performance of monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in predicting advanced stage disease and peritoneal metastasis with neutrophil-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in treatment-naive serous ovarian cancer.Material and methods: NLR, PLR, and MLR were calculated from preoperative blood samples of 63 treatment-naive ovarian cancer patients (58 serous, 92.1%) who underwent primary debulking surgery. FIGO 2021 staging criteria were used. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests (with Bonferroni correction) were used for intergroup comparisons; multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to determine independent predictors. The discriminative performance of MLR was evaluated using ROC analysis.Results: 92.1% of the cohort had serous histology, and 61.9% had advanced-stage disease (FIGO stages III-IV). In multivariate analysis (adjusted for age and menopause), only MLR was found to be independently associated with advanced-stage disease (adjusted OR: 4.25; 95% CI: 1.24-14.49; p=0.021). NLR and PLR showed no significance. MLR was also associated with peritoneal metastasis (p=0.017) and intestinal infiltration (p=0.019). In ROC analysis, the AUC was 0.706 (95% CI: 0.567-0.845; p=0.006). The optimal cut-off value was determined as 0.30 (sensitivity 48.7%, specificity 91.7%); an alternative cut-off value of 0.17 (sensitivity 82.1%, specificity 50.0%) was evaluated for high sensitivity. Conclusion: In treatment-naive serous ovarian cancer, MLR demonstrated superior performance compared to NLR and PLR in predicting advanced disease and peritoneal metastasis (adjusted OR: 4.25; AUC: 0.706). This finding supports the clinical significance of the monocyte-macrophage axis in serous ovarian cancer with predominantly transcoelomic spread. The prognostic value and optimal cut-off values of MLR should be confirmed by prospective multicenter studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1918061
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Superiority of MLR Over NLR and PLR In Predicting Advanced Stage Disease In Treatment-Naive Serous Ovarian Cancer

Simge Tezel Yozgat, Orkun İlgen, Berrin Göktuğ Kadıoğlu, Gökhan Aras et al.
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Superiority of MLR Over NLR and PLR In Predicting Advanced Stage Disease In Treatment-Naive Serous Ovarian Cancer

Simge Tezel Yozgat, Orkun İlgen, Berrin Göktuğ Kadıoğlu, Gökhan Aras, Nazım Ozan Çelebioğlu, Sibel Ejder Tekgündüz
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers in ovarian cancer is contradictory. This study aimed to compare the performance of monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in predicting advanced stage disease and peritoneal metastasis with neutrophil-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in treatment-naive serous ovarian cancer.Material and methods: NLR, PLR, and MLR were calculated from preoperative blood samples of 63 treatment-naive ovarian cancer patients (58 serous, 92.1%) who underwent primary debulking surgery. FIGO 2021 staging criteria were used. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests (with Bonferroni correction) were used for intergroup comparisons; multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to determine independent predictors. The discriminative performance of MLR was evaluated using ROC analysis.Results: 92.1% of the cohort had serous histology, and 61.9% had advanced-stage disease (FIGO stages III-IV). In multivariate analysis (adjusted for age and menopause), only MLR was found to be independently associated with advanced-stage disease (adjusted OR: 4.25; 95% CI: 1.24-14.49; p=0.021). NLR and PLR showed no significance. MLR was also associated with peritoneal metastasis (p=0.017) and intestinal infiltration (p=0.019). In ROC analysis, the AUC was 0.706 (95% CI: 0.567-0.845; p=0.006). The optimal cut-off value was determined as 0.30 (sensitivity 48.7%, specificity 91.7%); an alternative cut-off value of 0.17 (sensitivity 82.1%, specificity 50.0%) was evaluated for high sensitivity. Conclusion: In treatment-naive serous ovarian cancer, MLR demonstrated superior performance compared to NLR and PLR in predicting advanced disease and peritoneal metastasis (adjusted OR: 4.25; AUC: 0.706). This finding supports the clinical significance of the monocyte-macrophage axis in serous ovarian cancer with predominantly transcoelomic spread. The prognostic value and optimal cut-off values of MLR should be confirmed by prospective multicenter studies.

Journal of Basic and Clinical Health SciencesVol. 10(2)
Balıkesir University (TR), Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.