Menstrual tracking apps and reproductive privacy: Global perspectives on governing menstrual health data

Menstrual tracking applications (MTAs) are now a routine part of digital life and central to the growing FemTech industry. By turning intimate menstrual and reproductive details into data, they create new risks of privacy invasion, commercial misuse and state surveillance. This paper compares how four jurisdictions — namely the US (post Dobbs), Canada, the UK, the European Union (EU), and India — govern menstrual health data and the predictive claims made by MTAs. Through comparative legal analysis, regulatory gap mapping and doctrinal review, three weaknesses emerge. The first is inconsistent recognition of menstrual and reproductive data as sensitive or special category information requiring heightened safeguards. The second is limited algorithmic accountability for predictive features such as ovulation and fertility forecasts, despite their influence on personal health and reproductive choices. The third is fragmented cross-border enforcement that enables regulatory arbitrage and leaves remedies weak in practice. Case studies, including the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) action against Flo Health, the Canadian class action with oversight by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC), the UK Information Commissioner’s 2023 review of fertility tracking apps and India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 read with the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules 2025 and Medical Device Rules 2017, illustrate both progress and persistent gaps. The paper advances a reform agenda built on five priorities: classify reproductive data as sensitive; mandate independent validation and audit of predictive claims; embed privacy by design with granular consent, minimisation and deletion by default; impose distribution safeguards at the platform level; and strengthen cross-border regulatory cooperation. It concludes that protecting reproductive autonomy requires recognising informational self-determination as a core right. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of data protection & privacy.
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69554/fdkx8530
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Menstrual tracking apps and reproductive privacy: Global perspectives on governing menstrual health data

Maria Jawed, R Girish
Journal of data protection & privacy.
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Menstrual tracking apps and reproductive privacy: Global perspectives on governing menstrual health data

Maria Jawed, R Girish
article en

Abstract

Menstrual tracking applications (MTAs) are now a routine part of digital life and central to the growing FemTech industry. By turning intimate menstrual and reproductive details into data, they create new risks of privacy invasion, commercial misuse and state surveillance. This paper compares how four jurisdictions — namely the US (post Dobbs), Canada, the UK, the European Union (EU), and India — govern menstrual health data and the predictive claims made by MTAs. Through comparative legal analysis, regulatory gap mapping and doctrinal review, three weaknesses emerge. The first is inconsistent recognition of menstrual and reproductive data as sensitive or special category information requiring heightened safeguards. The second is limited algorithmic accountability for predictive features such as ovulation and fertility forecasts, despite their influence on personal health and reproductive choices. The third is fragmented cross-border enforcement that enables regulatory arbitrage and leaves remedies weak in practice. Case studies, including the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) action against Flo Health, the Canadian class action with oversight by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC), the UK Information Commissioner’s 2023 review of fertility tracking apps and India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 read with the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules 2025 and Medical Device Rules 2017, illustrate both progress and persistent gaps. The paper advances a reform agenda built on five priorities: classify reproductive data as sensitive; mandate independent validation and audit of predictive claims; embed privacy by design with granular consent, minimisation and deletion by default; impose distribution safeguards at the platform level; and strengthen cross-border regulatory cooperation. It concludes that protecting reproductive autonomy requires recognising informational self-determination as a core right. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Journal of data protection & privacy.Vol. 8(4)
Gujarat National Law University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.