Psychological Violence and Digital Monitoring in Young Adults' Romantic Relationships: The Role of Interparental Conflict Profiles and Emotion Regulation Mediation

ABSTRACT Interparental conflict could lead to long‐term effects on offspring, increasing the likelihood of committing intimate partner violence, such as psychological violence and digital monitoring. This study aimed to classify different interparental conflict patterns based on frequency, intensity, and threat perception and to test the association between these profiles and emotional dysregulation. Three hundred six young adults aged 23–35 ( M = 27.34, SD = 3.52) in heterosexual romantic relationships participated. Data were analysed utilizing latent profile analysis (LPA) to detect patterns of interparental conflict. Subsequently, a mediation model was tested to explore how parental conflict profiles are associated with psychological violence and digital monitoring, with emotion regulation difficulties mediating the relationship. The LPA results revealed five profiles: 1. low conflict; 2. moderate conflict, high threat; 3. high frequency, low threat; 4. moderate intensity and threat, high frequency; 5. high conflict. Findings showed that, compared to Profile 3, all profiles, except Profile 5, had a significant indirect effect, via emotion regulation, on both psychological violence and digital monitoring. The study suggests strategies to enhance emotional regulation and interventions to assist parents in managing their conflicts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70282
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Violence and Digital Monitoring in Young Adults' Romantic Relationships: The Role of Interparental Conflict Profiles and Emotion Regulation Mediation

Immacolata Di Napoli, Concetta Esposito, Barbara Agueli, Nicole Bellanca
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Psychological Violence and Digital Monitoring in Young Adults' Romantic Relationships: The Role of Interparental Conflict Profiles and Emotion Regulation Mediation

Immacolata Di Napoli, Concetta Esposito, Barbara Agueli, Nicole Bellanca
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Interparental conflict could lead to long‐term effects on offspring, increasing the likelihood of committing intimate partner violence, such as psychological violence and digital monitoring. This study aimed to classify different interparental conflict patterns based on frequency, intensity, and threat perception and to test the association between these profiles and emotional dysregulation. Three hundred six young adults aged 23–35 ( M = 27.34, SD = 3.52) in heterosexual romantic relationships participated. Data were analysed utilizing latent profile analysis (LPA) to detect patterns of interparental conflict. Subsequently, a mediation model was tested to explore how parental conflict profiles are associated with psychological violence and digital monitoring, with emotion regulation difficulties mediating the relationship. The LPA results revealed five profiles: 1. low conflict; 2. moderate conflict, high threat; 3. high frequency, low threat; 4. moderate intensity and threat, high frequency; 5. high conflict. Findings showed that, compared to Profile 3, all profiles, except Profile 5, had a significant indirect effect, via emotion regulation, on both psychological violence and digital monitoring. The study suggests strategies to enhance emotional regulation and interventions to assist parents in managing their conflicts.

Journal of Community & Applied Social PsychologyVol. 36(4)
University of Foggia (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.