Reimagining agency: Subjectivity as a radical lens on institutional work

Institutional theory has long been concerned with the relationship between agency and structure in explaining how institutions are created, maintained and transformed. While early formulations emphasized the constraining power of institutional structures, subsequent work – most notably the institutional work literature – has sought to recuperate agency by foregrounding the purposive actions of individuals and collective actors. Despite these advances, institutional theory continues to grapple with a persistent paradox: agency is treated as structurally constrained when explaining institutional reproduction, yet as relatively autonomous and intentional when accounting for institutional change. We argue that this paradox stems from an implicit assumption shared across much of institutional theory: the view that agency and structure are analytically and ontologically separable. Drawing on Judith Butler’s philosophical work on the formation of subjectivities, we challenge existing theoretical accounts of institutional reproduction and change by reconceptualizing agency and structures as intersubjective relational accomplishments that co-constitute institutionalization. To this end, we developed a psychosocial approach to institutional work that views embodied performativity and affective relationality as central to the enactment, maintenance and disruption of institutions, offering a novel and provocative intervention into ongoing debates on microfoundations of institutional processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Relations
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261449074
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining agency: Subjectivity as a radical lens on institutional work

Yuliya Shymko, Ajnesh Prasad, Marianna Fotaki
Human Relations
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Reimagining agency: Subjectivity as a radical lens on institutional work

Yuliya Shymko, Ajnesh Prasad, Marianna Fotaki
article en

Abstract

Institutional theory has long been concerned with the relationship between agency and structure in explaining how institutions are created, maintained and transformed. While early formulations emphasized the constraining power of institutional structures, subsequent work – most notably the institutional work literature – has sought to recuperate agency by foregrounding the purposive actions of individuals and collective actors. Despite these advances, institutional theory continues to grapple with a persistent paradox: agency is treated as structurally constrained when explaining institutional reproduction, yet as relatively autonomous and intentional when accounting for institutional change. We argue that this paradox stems from an implicit assumption shared across much of institutional theory: the view that agency and structure are analytically and ontologically separable. Drawing on Judith Butler’s philosophical work on the formation of subjectivities, we challenge existing theoretical accounts of institutional reproduction and change by reconceptualizing agency and structures as intersubjective relational accomplishments that co-constitute institutionalization. To this end, we developed a psychosocial approach to institutional work that views embodied performativity and affective relationality as central to the enactment, maintenance and disruption of institutions, offering a novel and provocative intervention into ongoing debates on microfoundations of institutional processes.

Human Relations
Audencia Business School (FR), University of Warwick (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.