Experimental Comparison of Cement Dosage in Concrete Mixture Calculations According to TS 802 And ACI 211.1-22 Standards: Effect on Carbon Emissions

The impact of cement use in concrete production on both cost and carbon emissions is becoming increasingly evident. This study examines the cement dosage calculation methods of the TS 802 standard used in Turkey and the ACI 211.1-22 standard, which is widely applied in the United States and internationally, in comparison with experimental data. In the research, a total of 92 data sets, including 61 sets of experimental mixtures consisting of two different cement types, two different aggregate sources and various granulometry combinations, and 31 data compiled from the literature, were evaluated. In addition to the experimental results for each mixture, theoretical cement amounts were calculated based on the TS 802 and ACI 211.1-22 methods, and the deviations occurring in different strength classes were analyzed. In conclusion, the TS 802 and ACI 211.1-22 methods were shown to increase the cement consumption by increasing safety margins in the C35/45, C40/50, and C45/55 classes, which in turn increased both production costs and the carbon footprint. Conversely, for some mixtures in the low and medium strength classes, theoretical dosages were found to be closer to experimental values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uluslararası mühendislik araştırma ve geliştirme dergisi
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29137/ijerad.1882990
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Comparison of Cement Dosage in Concrete Mixture Calculations According to TS 802 And ACI 211.1-22 Standards: Effect on Carbon Emissions

Pınar Şen, İlker Kalkan, Boğaçhan Başaran
Uluslararası mühendislik araştırma ve geliştirme dergisi
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Experimental Comparison of Cement Dosage in Concrete Mixture Calculations According to TS 802 And ACI 211.1-22 Standards: Effect on Carbon Emissions

Pınar Şen, İlker Kalkan, Boğaçhan Başaran
article en

Abstract

The impact of cement use in concrete production on both cost and carbon emissions is becoming increasingly evident. This study examines the cement dosage calculation methods of the TS 802 standard used in Turkey and the ACI 211.1-22 standard, which is widely applied in the United States and internationally, in comparison with experimental data. In the research, a total of 92 data sets, including 61 sets of experimental mixtures consisting of two different cement types, two different aggregate sources and various granulometry combinations, and 31 data compiled from the literature, were evaluated. In addition to the experimental results for each mixture, theoretical cement amounts were calculated based on the TS 802 and ACI 211.1-22 methods, and the deviations occurring in different strength classes were analyzed. In conclusion, the TS 802 and ACI 211.1-22 methods were shown to increase the cement consumption by increasing safety margins in the C35/45, C40/50, and C45/55 classes, which in turn increased both production costs and the carbon footprint. Conversely, for some mixtures in the low and medium strength classes, theoretical dosages were found to be closer to experimental values.

Uluslararası mühendislik araştırma ve geliştirme dergisiVol. 18(3)
Kırıkkale University (TR), Amasya Üniversitesi (TR)
Kırıkkale Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.