Asking AI About Your Car: AI-Augmented Vehicle Owner’s Manuals Support Integrated System Understanding Beyond Traditional Documentation

ObjectiveThis study investigates the effectiveness of an AI-powered interactive vehicle owner's manual compared to a traditional static manual in improving users' understanding of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) using a production vehicle's owner's manual.BackgroundAs vehicle automation becomes increasingly complex, drivers face challenges in understanding ADAS features. While traditional owner's manuals have demonstrated effectiveness when they are used, there remains potential to enhance driver engagement through AI and provide more interactive and accessible learning experiences.MethodsUsing a between-subjects design, 38 participants were randomly assigned to learn about four commercially available ADAS features using either a PDF manual or a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) AI manual. Mental model accuracy was assessed through multiple-choice questions, while participants' reasoning patterns were analyzed using structural topic modeling (STM) of open-ended responses.ResultsBoth training methods improved mental model accuracy from pre- to post-training, with no significant differences between PDF and RAG conditions in quantitative learning outcomes. However, STM analysis revealed distinct qualitative differences in the participants' reasoning patterns. RAG-trained participants demonstrated more sophisticated systems-level thinking, particularly in feature integration reasoning. Analysis through the lens of the Technology Acceptance Model revealed that both methods operate through similar psychological mechanisms, with perceived usefulness aiding user acceptance.ConclusionAI-augmented owner's manuals achieve comparable learning effectiveness to traditional documentation while enhancing feature integration reasoning. Interactive AI systems serve as effective enhancements rather than replacements for proven educational approaches, guiding users toward more sophisticated mental models of complex automated systems.ApplicationThis research provides insights for automotive manufacturers and documentation specialists on effective approaches for educating drivers about complex vehicle automation systems, potentially improving safety and user experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261454185
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asking AI About Your Car: AI-Augmented Vehicle Owner’s Manuals Support Integrated System Understanding Beyond Traditional Documentation

Jimin Kim, Benjamin Austin, Josh Domeyer, Joonbum Lee et al.
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Asking AI About Your Car: AI-Augmented Vehicle Owner’s Manuals Support Integrated System Understanding Beyond Traditional Documentation

Jimin Kim, Benjamin Austin, Josh Domeyer, Joonbum Lee, John D. Lee
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study investigates the effectiveness of an AI-powered interactive vehicle owner's manual compared to a traditional static manual in improving users' understanding of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) using a production vehicle's owner's manual.BackgroundAs vehicle automation becomes increasingly complex, drivers face challenges in understanding ADAS features. While traditional owner's manuals have demonstrated effectiveness when they are used, there remains potential to enhance driver engagement through AI and provide more interactive and accessible learning experiences.MethodsUsing a between-subjects design, 38 participants were randomly assigned to learn about four commercially available ADAS features using either a PDF manual or a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) AI manual. Mental model accuracy was assessed through multiple-choice questions, while participants' reasoning patterns were analyzed using structural topic modeling (STM) of open-ended responses.ResultsBoth training methods improved mental model accuracy from pre- to post-training, with no significant differences between PDF and RAG conditions in quantitative learning outcomes. However, STM analysis revealed distinct qualitative differences in the participants' reasoning patterns. RAG-trained participants demonstrated more sophisticated systems-level thinking, particularly in feature integration reasoning. Analysis through the lens of the Technology Acceptance Model revealed that both methods operate through similar psychological mechanisms, with perceived usefulness aiding user acceptance.ConclusionAI-augmented owner's manuals achieve comparable learning effectiveness to traditional documentation while enhancing feature integration reasoning. Interactive AI systems serve as effective enhancements rather than replacements for proven educational approaches, guiding users toward more sophisticated mental models of complex automated systems.ApplicationThis research provides insights for automotive manufacturers and documentation specialists on effective approaches for educating drivers about complex vehicle automation systems, potentially improving safety and user experience.

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Toyota Motor Corporation (Switzerland) (CH), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Toyota Collaborative Safety Research Center
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.