Beyond victimhood: Feminist criminology and the Beijing platform’s framing of women in criminal justice

The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action (1995) are seminal cornerstones of global gender equality policy that have shaped the work of the Commission on the Status of Women for the past 30 years. They have also served as a basis, benchmark, or ideal for academic researchers to align with global gender equality objectives. However, they have not been the focus of systematic research in feminist criminology. We conducted a systematic content analysis of the text of these outcome documents of the Fourth World Conference on Women to measure their treatments of three core areas of feminist criminology. While both documents powerfully advanced the rights of women and girls, our analysis demonstrates that their treatment of women and criminal justice is notably one-dimensional, framing women primarily as victims while largely overlooking the complex and multifaceted roles they occupy as offenders, detainees, and professionals within the criminal justice system. Our analysis reveals how the Beijing Declaration and the Beijing Platform for Action reinforce a victim-centric paradigm that downplays the structural and systemic injustices faced by women and girls who violate the law, and fail to recognize the accomplishments and challenges faced by women working in law enforcement, judicial, custodial, and peacebuilding professions. In doing so, they reveal a particular gender regime that makes some gains for women’s victimhood, but reinforces traditional gender roles overall. We argue for a more holistic and inclusive approach to gender and justice in global policy frameworks. By broadening the lens beyond victimhood, international gender policy can more effectively contribute to equitable and just criminal justice systems worldwide and truly fulfill the aims of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Sociology
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921261447601
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond victimhood: Feminist criminology and the Beijing platform’s framing of women in criminal justice

Sheetal Ranjan, Rosemary Barberet, Dawn Beichner-Thomas
Current Sociology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Beyond victimhood: Feminist criminology and the Beijing platform’s framing of women in criminal justice

Sheetal Ranjan, Rosemary Barberet, Dawn Beichner-Thomas
article en

Abstract

The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action (1995) are seminal cornerstones of global gender equality policy that have shaped the work of the Commission on the Status of Women for the past 30 years. They have also served as a basis, benchmark, or ideal for academic researchers to align with global gender equality objectives. However, they have not been the focus of systematic research in feminist criminology. We conducted a systematic content analysis of the text of these outcome documents of the Fourth World Conference on Women to measure their treatments of three core areas of feminist criminology. While both documents powerfully advanced the rights of women and girls, our analysis demonstrates that their treatment of women and criminal justice is notably one-dimensional, framing women primarily as victims while largely overlooking the complex and multifaceted roles they occupy as offenders, detainees, and professionals within the criminal justice system. Our analysis reveals how the Beijing Declaration and the Beijing Platform for Action reinforce a victim-centric paradigm that downplays the structural and systemic injustices faced by women and girls who violate the law, and fail to recognize the accomplishments and challenges faced by women working in law enforcement, judicial, custodial, and peacebuilding professions. In doing so, they reveal a particular gender regime that makes some gains for women’s victimhood, but reinforces traditional gender roles overall. We argue for a more holistic and inclusive approach to gender and justice in global policy frameworks. By broadening the lens beyond victimhood, international gender policy can more effectively contribute to equitable and just criminal justice systems worldwide and truly fulfill the aims of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.

Current Sociology
Montclair State University (US), Illinois State University (US), John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.